User talk:Michaelmcgrinder
Your submission at AfC The Old Reliable Theatre Tavern (August 21)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Old Reliable Theatre Tavern.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! LukeSurl t c 12:40, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
|
Hello! Michaelmcgrinder,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Old Reliable Theatre Tavern, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC Old Reliable Theatre Tavern was accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:38, 25 May 2014 (UTC)June 2015[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hypatia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- }.</ref> but the word was also used for brick tiles on the roofs of houses and for pottery sherds). Afterward, the men proceeded to mutilate her and, finally, burn her limbs. News of Hypatia's
- idx?c=wiarchives;cc=wiarchives;q1=hypatia;rgn=main;view=text;didno=uw-whs-us0200an]</ref>,<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=1OYCAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA14&lpg=PA14&dq=hypatia+3,+wpa&
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:16, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest[edit]
Hello, Michaelmcgrinder. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
- instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the
{{request edit}}template); - avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:38, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Also, your userpage is very, very promotional so I'm going to delete it. You can have some information about yourself on your page, but it should only relate to your editing on Wikipedia. Be cautious, as Wikipedia is not meant to be a place to promote one's self or your works. This might not have been your intention, but it's very, very easy for this to come across this way when you're editing on things about yourself. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- I've noticed that most of your edits have included you mentioning yourself or your work somewhere on Wikipedia. Please do not do this. This is seen as self-promotion and can potentially lead to you being blocked if it's believed that you are only here to promote yourself. The general rule of thumb is that if you have a strong conflict of interest, that you should wait and let others write about you rather than to add yourself to Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of The Old Reliable Press for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Old Reliable Press is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Old Reliable Press until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:52, 9 December 2015 (UTC)