User talk:Michaelm

Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.

Welcome!

Hello, Michaelm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Whosyourjudas\^talk 05:22, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michaelm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was try to fix some of the pages something I was try to add in good faith was not vandalism also I apologize to moxy (Look at 56) and will not edit anymore pages https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Moxy Michaelm (talk) 00:21, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you are not going to edit anymore pages, then there is no need to unblock you. PhilKnight (talk) 07:29, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michaelm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was try to fix some of the pages something I was try to add on good intention was not vandalism also I apologize to moxy (Look at 56) And I will behave here and I will contribute to the community positive way I was clean messes in article that people vandalize. and PhilKnight I am sorry for saying "I will not edit anymore pages" Because I did not know what else to say. I felt I have to say that so I would be unblocked advancely I will edit again. It will only be temporary not to edit. Again I'm sorry for everything. Again I will contribute to the community in a positive way. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Moxy Michaelm (talk)

Decline reason:

Best we leave you blocked. I'm not sure if you are saying you simply don't understand how to edit, if you are saying you have no plans to edit, or if you are saying you were deliberately harming the project but we should now trust you not to do so again. Either way, best we leave you blocked. Yamla (talk) 13:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michaelm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was try to fix some of the pages something I was try to add on good intention was not vandalism also I apologize to moxy (Look at 56) And I will behave here and I will contribute to the community positive way I was clean messes in article that people vandalize. and PhilKnight I am sorry for saying "I will not edit anymore pages" Because I did not know what else to say. I felt I have to say that so I would be unblocked advancely I will edit again. It will only be temporary not to edit. Again I'm sorry for everything. Again I will contribute to the community in a positive way. I was not deliberately harming the project honestly. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Moxy Michaelm (talk)

Decline reason:

This doesn't address your edit warring, and I'm not really sure you have the English-language proficiency to even do so. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:33, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michaelm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was try to fix some of the pages something I was try to add on good intentions I thought this page was vandalized https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/New_Democratic_Party and moxy was putting it back then eventually I end up sent moxy a note that if he doesn't stop he is going to be blocked then he sent me a note that I keep. It was a misunderstanding. I apologize to moxy (Look at 56) https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Moxy I overstep and I should not of done that. It was a mistake It will not happen again. I am not asking for being unblocked immediately I am asking for instead of a indefinite block. Maybe be block for 3-4 months. I will be ok with a 6 month block. Even know it was a misunderstanding. I got to take responsibility for this. Also I would like to apologize to moxy directory Michaelm (talk)

Decline reason:

Declined due to basic competency concerns. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:11, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@El C:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michaelm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It was a misunderstanding. I apologize to moxy (Look at 56) https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Moxy I overstep and I should not of done that. It was a mistake It will not happen again. I understand I have a checkered pass. And I will not do things like I did in the pass. You can trust that I will leave that behind. I am not asking for being unblocked immediately I am asking for instead of a indefinite block. Maybe be block for 3-4 months. I will be ok with a 6 month block. I will be even be ok if there is a timeline for the block to end. Even know it was a misunderstanding. I got to take responsibility for this. Also I would like to apologize to moxy directory. I honestly feel bad for this. I regret the pass and now. And you can trust it will not happen again. The reason why i'm here to contribute to the community Michaelm (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 01:13, 29 June 2021

Decline reason:

It should have been clear from the first request that you were, as judges say, unlikely to prevail. Yet you kept trying, further confirming that your English isn't up to the task here. And while you haven't been impolite, you have kept not taking the hint, changing your argument with each new try, collapsing further into a desperation that's rather pathetic to have to read.

But no more. You have reached the end of this road; in fact to me (and others here, I think) you're long past it. So after I decline this I will be revoking your talk page access. You can still try through UTRS, but this way you won't be wasting our time (and yours, too). Have a nice day. — Daniel Case (talk) 22:29, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ticket no. 82202bbb1b4c2e495337b9227dd2dd5b

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 22:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 44889

UTRS appeal #44889 is now closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:23, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fabuloso

Hello, Michaelm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fabuloso, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fabuloso

Hello, Michaelm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fabuloso".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:53, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:PMP party

Template:PMP party has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:16, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]