User talk:Michaelkhany

September 2016[edit]

Hello, Michaelkhany. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Objective vision, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 11:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

Thanks for your message on my talk page. As you will see in my edit summary, where I have reverted your removal of the template for now, this is not about "referencing" a scientific article - you have copied and pasted an entire paragraph, even to the point that it now has an unattributed quote in it. And, this is not about "breaking the law" - it is about wikipedia's policies on copying content, which do not allow for that - see WP:COPYPASTE. Please read up on this before simply reverting - there are still numerous issues with the article, and you still have a conflict of interest in editing it. Melcous (talk) 21:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]