Jump to content

User talk:Michael Boy Jordan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!

Compute Card moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Compute Card, does not have enough sources and does not have much content. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 94rain Talk 08:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Compute Card (March 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not enough sourcing to have its own page.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Michael Boy Jordan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then just delete Compute Card.

[edit]

I created other pages, such as Versions of macOS and the redirect Eye Phone to iPhone. You should delete the page:Draft:Compute Card.

Check out my pages!

[edit]

Check. Out. My. Pages! Sorry. But. My. Computer. Has a. Problem and. I am trying to fix it.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Compute Card (March 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sources are all just industry press, mostly talking about how it's been withdrawn from the market. I don't see anything about this product which makes it notable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 19:26, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

[edit]

Please. Delete. My. Edit. My. Computer. Still. Has. A problem. With its. Keyboard. And i. Am trying. To. Fix it

Your contributed article, Versions of macOS

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Versions of macOS. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Macintosh operating systems. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Macintosh operating systems. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. DGG ( talk ) 05:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop.

[edit]

You need to absolutely stop editing Wikipedia until you learn what an encyclopedia is and how anything works. You have been on a spastic editing spree of junk and have been reverted, wasting the time of a lot of people. You've done a lot of disruptive editing bordering on vandalism, and you should have been blocked for this already. — Smuckola(talk) 18:08, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted it

[edit]

Dont. Worry. I. Had. Reverted. My. Edit. Sorry. But my computer still has the problem handling periods and i. Am. Trying to fix it

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Michael Boy Jordan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Sincerely, Masum Reza☎ 11:21, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Speedy deletion nomination of Windows XP Professional SP3 retail box label

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Windows XP Professional SP3 retail box label requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

I don't know what to say, this is not nonsense but totally utterly useless

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Viztor (talk) 01:42, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michael

[edit]

I realized you've only joined the community. So I'm reaching out to see if you have any questions. I understand you may feel some information is well needed, but I would advise you read WP:ENC and WP:NOT. I appreciate your participation :) Viztor (talk) 01:45, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Windows XP Professional SP3 retail box label, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:49, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah: Wellp. You can see below, as you can look up in your deletion log for this, he won't ever stop. He literally created an article as a hoaxed 404 page. — Smuckola(talk) 22:49, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!

[edit]

Just. To. Show. Off. My. Talk. Page. Post! For august! But. Sorry. The preiod bug is. Bad and is. Hard to stop thinking. About! :( Michael Boy Jordan (talk) 22:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Apple Computer Corps

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Apple Computer Corps, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mcampany (talk) 22:34, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 11:30, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michael Boy Jordan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Most of my edits are good edits. For example, in Macintosh 512K I made spelling fixes, I moved Apple Guide to its correct name, and other edits that are good to Wikipedia. Also, I finally fixed my bug! I'm now re-reading "Your first article" and "Editing policy". Michael Boy Jordan (talk) 12:21, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The responses below make me worry that competence issues may also be a factor. Having reviewd your edit history, I have serious concerns about your ability to edit productively, and do not see that it would be in Wikipedia's interest to lift this block. Yunshui 雲水 08:06, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've merged your requests, as only one open request is needed. Subsequent comments should be standard, unformatted comments. 331dot (talk) 12:25, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

K6ka Could you clarify the basis of the NOTHERE claim? 331dot (talk) 12:28, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A glance at this user's deleted edits is eye-opening. I would expect any unblock to be conditional on an agreement to cease creating redirect pages or nonsense articles. Yunshui 雲水 16:39, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That, and given the nonsense here, here, and here, and I cannot see how this editor can be taken seriously enough to edit the encyclopedia. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 19:22, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Then how about unblocking me for everything but creating articles? Michael Boy Jordan (talk) 19:32, 11 August 2019 (UTC) And then a few months later, I can learn my lesson about article creation? Michael Boy Jordan (talk) 19:32, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How about you address the reasons for your block, which were primarily centered around your inappropriate page creations (despite receiving numerous warnings), rather than just talking about your "good" edits? I can't imagine why an editor making good edits would also create obviously bad articles and ignore warnings about it. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 01:59, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why. I'm looking at some resources right now, and by the end of the month, I'll start making good articles. For now, you can unblock editing, but please do not unblock article creation right now. Michael Boy Jordan (talk) 02:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why. Then you are not getting unblocked. And for the record, we cannot block you from creating new pages while also regranting you the ability to edit other pages; if you are unblocked, you can edit and create almost all pages, and if you are blocked, you cannot edit or create any pages except for this one. We can unblock you on condition that you do not create any new pages (with the understanding that doing so again will probably lead to you being blocked immediately again), but I'm not comfortable with even that if the best response you can give is I don't know. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 02:14, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK. The answer is that I didn't know that creating new pages on Wikipedia has a more critical impact on Wikipedia than just editing pages does. The answer is that I DONT KNOW HOW TO MAKE GOOD ARTICLES. [1] Michael Boy Jordan (talk) 14:16, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed your ability to edit this page given your inappropriate edits here. Before making another request, read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit your appeal to the UTRS. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:26, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Help:Your_first_article

What is the NOTHERE claim?

[edit]

What is the NOTHERE claim? I don't know what it is! Michael Boy Jordan (talk) 16:57, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I read the NOTHERE claim.

[edit]

OK. I now understand that Wikipedia is not here to build an encyclopedia.

I need to make an edit to "/wiki/Apple_Card#Daily_Cash", changing the "physical card" link from "/wiki/Apple_Card#Physical_Card" to "/wiki/Apple_Card#Titanium_card".

This is an example of one of the good edits that I want to make. Michael Boy Jordan (talk) 16:57, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understand about blocking.

[edit]

I understand that I will made all good edits from now on, I understand that I'm blocked, and I'll never do it again. Michael Boy Jordan (talk) 16:55, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock message

[edit]

It has been a year now. I've learned a lot since then.

Wikipedia is not a place to express yourself. It is not a way to advertise or promote things. It is not a personal blog or forum. And it is not a place to spam. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia where people are there to learn things.

I also do Reddit and Twitter. I understand that Wikipedia is not Reddit or Twitter.

When I am unblocked I will improve articles. For example, I would fix spelling errors and add citations where needed.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michael Boy Jordan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

See the most recent section in my talk page. Michael Boy Jordan (talk) 01:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've evaded your block a couple times by editing while logged out, but what worries me is that your IP addresses were blocked several times for disruption. That was a while ago, though. What I'd like you to do is to propose an encyclopedic addition to one our articles and include a citation to a reliable source. It can be anything. A fact about your favorite film, or maybe a review of a video game, or maybe some news about a new Nvidia technology. Or a fact about butterflies. Whatever. Just try to make it look more encyclopedic than the stuff you've been blocked for in the past. Post it here on your talk page and make another unblock request. After you do that, I think we could probably unblock you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michael Boy Jordan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

See my addition below. Michael Boy Jordan (talk) 02:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That would be an unsuitable citation; see WP:CITE. Yamla (talk) 14:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

An addition with a citation

[edit]

I would like to add the following table to the Concatenated SMS article:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michael Boy Jordan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

An addition with a citation

Decline reason:

No compelling reason to unblock at this time. signed, Rosguill talk 18:27, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No. Are you sure you have read and understood WP:RS and WP:CITE? Really?!? --Yamla (talk) 16:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have read those before, but I am not sure what a "reliable source" is. Does it mean a popular source? Would adding more then one source (there are lots of them here) help at all? Michael Boy Jordan (talk) 16:41, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No that's not at all what it means, and this is moot because this content is also unencyclopedic as per WP:NOTMANUAL. This is indiscriminate WP:TRIVIA which is btw needlessly formatted into a gigantic and mostly blank table WP:UNDUE. And yes I know it's exactly the kind of information that you were advised above to hunt for, which is very wrong and it absolutely can not be anything. The examples given you above are mostly exactly what not to do, as per WP:CIR WP:TRIVIA WP:NOTNEWS and a lot of WP:NOT. This is not easy, it's the hardest possible thing, and it is not for everybody. What the esteemed colleague (and most Wikipedia culture) meant to say was to advise finding one character of one typographical error. One. One perfectly clear error in existing vital data. That is the easiest thing, instead of the actually hardest possible thing that most people will never understand and should totally avoid forever. And instead, just enjoy reading Wikipedia and encourage others to do likewise! — Smuckola(talk) 16:54, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all the helpful information! I'll just read Wikipedia for now. Michael Boy Jordan (talk) 20:53, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michael Boy Jordan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I mentioned in UTRS, I plan to make changes to technology related articles, including adding citations and fixing spelling errors. I understand why I was blocked 5 years ago, and my edits will be nothing like the ones I did back then. Michael Boy Jordan (talk) 16:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. Most reviewers will not have access to your UTRS request here. Please restate the contents here so your request can be reviewed. Without looking at your UTRS request, I can't tell if you've clearly demonstrated you understand WP:CITE and WP:RS now, after earlier clearly demonstrating you did not. Yamla (talk) 12:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Michael Boy Jordan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

UTRS contents and why I was unblocked are below.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=UTRS contents and why I was unblocked are below. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=UTRS contents and why I was unblocked are below. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=UTRS contents and why I was unblocked are below. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

From UTRS: I was very young when I first created my account. It’s been 5 years, and I have read a lot of Wikipedia and its rules (including WP:NOTHERE, WP:RS, and WP:CITE) in the meantime. When I am unblocked, I plan to make edits to technology related articles, adding information and citing from reliable sources, as well as fixing spelling errors.

Also (not in my request) the main reason I was blocked was because I was creating completely nonsense pages. I understand why I was blocked for this reason, and I won’t do that when I am unblocked.

  • I'm sympathetic to this request, but I'd appreciate if you could elaborate on why you created nonsense pages in the past, and how you've changed your approach to editing to avoid future issues. Also, Checkuser needed to determine if they've recently evaded their block, given the previous unblock decline for evasion. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elli, Michael Boy Jordan shares an IP address with two recently blocked socks. On the other hand, this IP is registered to a secondary school, and many of the device types are what I might expect to see in a school computer lab, so I think the best I can say is  Possible. I left some notes in cuwiki if another CU wants to review my findings. RoySmith (talk) 21:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to unblock here. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:39, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense pages I created

[edit]

I created them when I was very young, and I understood Wikipedia much less than I do now. It’s been 5 years.

I will change my editing by:

  • Only creating pages for actual topics that I can add evidence to with citations
  • Making edits to tech related articles, including fixing spelling errors and adding citable facts.

Michael Boy Jordan (talk) 20:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Michael_Boy_Jordan&oldid=1256379956"