Jump to content

User talk:Michael144

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

==

Hello Michael144! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Tyrenius 02:23, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

==




Guide to referencing

[edit]

Click on "show" to open contents.

You have uploaded this as GFDL granted by the uploader (i.e. you), but this can only be done in this way if you are the copyright holder also, in other words the artist. If you are not, then it is a breach of the permissions regulations. Tyrenius 07:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tyrenius, i have permission to use this image like all the rest by the artist. Thanks, Mike. --Michael144 15:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is in breach of wikipedia rules. You cannot release it as GFDL-self in that case. The artist can release it as GFDL-self on wikipedia, or as GFDL by stating that on his own website. Alternatively, if you have requested and gained permission for it to be used as GFDL, see Wikipedia:Example requests for permission:

if you are granted permission post the details of the permission granted at Wikipedia:Successful requests for permission. You should also send a copy of your request and the response to "permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org" where it will be permanently archived.

Otherwise the image will be deleted as having the wrong permission.

Tyrenius 02:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Artist_photo.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Artist_photo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 00:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above and related matters are the only things you have contributed to wikipedia. This does look somewhat promotional and WP:COI. May I encourage you to contribute to other articles also. Tyrenius 01:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tyrenius, my main goal for Justin was to get him noted on Wikipedia. I didn't realize i have to do more than that and , quite frankly, i do not have that much time on my hands to do so. And it does not look promotional - he deserves to be listed here. So if your published on Wikipedia your promoting a person only? That would mean almost every artist is promotional. Thanks, Mike. --Michael144 01:07, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:P0180small.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:P0180small.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 22:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Watermark Art Portfolio 064.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Watermark Art Portfolio 064.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:27, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Watermark Art Portfolio 026.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Watermark Art Portfolio 026.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:41, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Watermark Art Portfolio 080.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Watermark Art Portfolio 080.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Justin Michael Jenkins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Justin Michael Jenkins for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justin Michael Jenkins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Michael Jenkins (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:33, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]