User talk:Miccyrokse
January 2017
[edit]
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Existence of God have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 06:52, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Existence of God. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Existence of God was changed by Miccyrokse (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952553 on 2017-01-09T06:54:07+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:54, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Recent edits to Existence of God
[edit] Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edits because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Regards, — Moe Epsilon 07:22, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Miccyrokse, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Miccyrokse! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 9 January 2017 (UTC) |
January 2017
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dushyant Kumar, you may be blocked from editing. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:07, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
January 2017
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Arijit Singh has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Arijit Singh was changed by Miccyrokse (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959184 on 2017-01-15T19:56:33+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bigg Boss 10. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bigg Boss 10 was changed by Miccyrokse (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854648 on 2017-01-15T20:31:44+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:31, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Time how defined
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Time how defined, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 04:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Draft:Time how defined
[edit]
Draft:Time how defined, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Time how defined and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Time how defined during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC)