User talk:MiaHarris74
Welcome
[edit]
|
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Links to albums
[edit]I saw you reverted my edit which added a link to the album. Is there a style guide or something that says you should not link tracks to their original album? Thanks. Eldumpo (talk) 09:16, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
In the page Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Album article style advice#Style and form, there are two sections that, in addition to the overlink rule, imply that tracks should not be linked if not necessary: "Links should only be created to song articles that don't exist if the song merits the creation of an article per the notability guidelines at Wikipedia:Notability (music)#Songs," and then "If a track has an article of its own, the track name should link to that article." Note that the article explicitly mentions the track's own article. If you were to link a song that doesn't have a page to its parent album just for the sake of it, you would have to do that for every song mentioned in the article (for consistency), which would then create the overlink problem. MiaHarris74 (talk) 14:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for providing some links, although there doesn’t seem to be anything saying that there should not be a link to the album instead. Over-linking is more about duplicate links within same article, or linking to very basic/obvious items, which would not apply to these song/album links we are discussing? Eldumpo (talk) 17:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
The link I sent you specifically mentions a "track that has an article of its own" as the only reason to link it. What was your reason to do so? And why did you link "Revelations", but not "Where Eagles Dare", a song from the same album which appears first on the track listing? Shouldn't that be the track to link in this case? And why didn't you do the same with other songs from other albums, such as "For the Greater Good of God", which should then link to A Matter of Life and Death? Or "The Clansman", or "Sign of the Cross"? I know this isn't a proper argument, but I think it fits here: no other article on Wikipedia follows this. Your edit opens the door to a lot of unnecessary questions, and I don't really see the benefit for readers in linking songs that don't have their own page, not even a section in their parent album's page.
Please, do share if you have a good reason for it though. MiaHarris74 (talk) 17:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- The link says if there is a song title it should be linked, but not that a link to an album should not be placed (although it doesn’t say it should be). I happened to only link one song, but the logic of what I did could then be applied to others, but doesn’t mean I need to automatically make such other changes. As it happens I have saved some work by not doing so.Eldumpo (talk) 19:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Orphaned non-free image File:Nightwish - Walking in the Air.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Nightwish - Walking in the Air.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Nightwish - The Kinslayer.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Nightwish - The Kinslayer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)