User talk:MercuryLover05
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. ViridaeTalk 23:57, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
—Pilotguy push to talk 00:46, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- I've reviewed the block at the request of the other involved editor. I have no problem with the actions by the two blocking admins, Viridae and Pilotguy, but as a bit of leniency I'm reducing both blocks to run for 3 more hours from now. Please discuss your proposed changes on the talk page, rather than continuing to revert war - that is not the way to settle disputes about content. If you cannot justify the changes, then I suggest that you do not pursue the issue further. If needed, you can seek mediation - i.e., if you and the other editor remain in dispute. If edit warring continues, I'll regret being lenient this time and won't be next time. Metamagician3000 14:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Editing
[edit]You know if Wikipedia did not want you to edit their pages they would not have that little edit button you can press to edit ....
And Further more have you nothing better to do with your time than to make sure someone is block for editing which they are allowed to do ?
Blocked
[edit]You have been blocked for a total of 48 hours: For vandalizing User:Tainter and attempting to avoid detection by logging out, I have blocked you for 24 hours; I have blocked you for an additional 24 hours for the creation of a sockpuppet account, and I have indefinately blocked the sockpuppet. I have blocked the IP you used to vandalize for a total of 48 hours to prevent further disruption for the remainder of the block. If you continue in this behavior when your block expires, you will be subject to further blocks, up to and including indefinite blocking. Essjay (Talk) 08:49, 6 February 2007 (UTC)