User talk:Meow2021

I'm a new user on Wikipedia trying to create and organize content for architecture, development projects, and the Pattaya area even when it seems difficult to find appropriate information and links. Any help on these topics is appreciated.

Welcome!

Hi Meow2021! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Paul_012 (talk) 05:01, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A few tips

Hi. I have a few tips regarding your contributions:

When placing images, please place images below the section heading. Also avoid placing left-aligned images at the same position as a right-aligned one, since this will make text WP:sandwiched into a small column between the two images, which is an undesirable appearance. The same effect happens where left-aligned images clash with infoboxes, so do not place left-aligned images in the lead section of an article.
Avoid specifying image sizes in pixels, since doing so will override the user's specified preference. Instead, |upright can be placed in the image syntax to mark narrow images, so that they don't overwhelm the screen. It can also be used to specify relative sizes. E.g. upright=0.8 will make an image appear at 0.8 times the default width, and upright=1.2 will make it larger. This doesn't work in some infoboxe templates, including infobox skyscraper, in which case consider specifying a relatively small size (e.g. 180px) if your image is vertically extended.
Also, please avoid duplicating content from other articles if it's not directly relevant to the current subject. It's not necessary to copy content about transport to Pattaya into every neighbourhood article, or to copy the description from the lead of the Pattaya article into every skyscraper in the city. But if you do so, you must provide an attribution notice, in order to comply with Wikipedia's licensing policies. The simplest way is to make a note in edit summary, saying something like, copied content from [[Pattaya]]; see that page's history for attribution. See WP:Copying within Wikipedia for details.
The "See also" section should generally only contain links to articles that are not already linked within the article text, so linking to Pattaya when it has been earlier mentioned and linked to is unnecessary.

Hope this helps! --Paul_012 (talk) 05:43, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Many Thanks! I really like the concept of having the information on the skyscraper pages. I noticed your changes to relevant articles. Should I add the attribution note to them (and if, how? since it is already on) or for future items? Meow2021 (talk) 06:09, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For edits already done, you could make a WP:dummy edit to provide the notice, like this. For future items you can just note it in the edit summary when saving the edit. --Paul_012 (talk) 08:12, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Riviera Group

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Riviera Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:10, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosing personal connections

Hi. I noticed that a photo you uploaded, File:Mod Dam 1199 R.jpg, appears to be identical to the one Kleff originally released. If you have a personal connection with him, or with the subjects of other articles you've edited, please declare the connection per the instructions at WP:Conflict of interest. (This is mandatory if the connection is professional.) Thanks. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:37, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The photo was published together with other materials for press and media years ago. Regards. Meow2021 (talk) 14:11, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. In that case, however, the author and source information on the image description page on Commons will need to be corrected. Evidence of permission via email will also be needed (see Commons:Commons:OTRS for instructions), as press materials are generally not released under a free licence allowed on Wikimedia Commons. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:24, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look and provide the information asap. I am a news writer interested in regaining forgotten stories and places that I think are worth shedding light on.Meow2021 (talk) 15:33, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mod Dam 1199 R

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mod Dam 1199 R, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mod Dam 1199 R for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mod Dam 1199 R is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mod Dam 1199 R until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:49, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Riviera Group

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Riviera Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:25, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Kleff

In the first revision of the article, you wrote that the date of birth was November 21 1967 in Boppard, Germany. How did you know this detail?--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 18:33, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rocknrollmancer, detailed information about Mario Kleff - Biography (ENG/TH), REm issue 115/12/2010 Page 80, ...Mario Kleff was born on November 21, 1967 in Boppard..., Regards Meow2021 (talk) 21:30, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logotype of The Riviera Group, Thailand.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logotype of The Riviera Group, Thailand.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI for Mario Kleff

Hello. Do you have any connection to Mario Kleff or any companies of his? It seems that many of your edits are related to these topics. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:35, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This question has already been asked and answered. No. Just from time to time improve any of the articles I have created whenever I see something that can be improved. Regards Meow2021 (talk) 06:16, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:20, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mario Kleff for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mario Kleff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Kleff (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 13:04, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coi

@Meow2021: Thanks for coming back to the coin board and confirming you don't have a COI. scope_creep^Talk 15:35, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep: Of course. I understand it needs to be sorted out. Meow2021 (talk) 15:41, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Statement: The last few weeks have been a welcome to Wikipedia. I've learned what it's all about - emotion, greed and control. No help and support other than a few professional editors. I think some of the editors shouldn't even have authority to manage or control articles. Let me put it this way: You may have won a battle, but not the war. Something that will never change, facts. I don't think The Riviera Group or Mr. Mario Kleff need Wikipedia to be successful. They don't hide behind the screens, they generate business and shape the future, you do not.

August 2021

Hello, I'm Vexations. I noticed that you made a comment on the page [:https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mario_Kleff_(2nd_nomination)&type=revision&diff=1038200223&oldid=1038166134&diffmode=source] that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vexations (talk) 11:16, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vexations I agree with you = WP discussions should be civilized and reasonable. There seems to be a misunderstanding. It is not in my nature to be abusive or uncivilized as it is myself who tried to be rational on the discussion page in order to join the conversation for the best outcome. The only part I could imagine you talk about is:

Delete This is promotional. I reviewed all the sources ever used in the article. There is some very minimal coverage in independent, reliable sources, but mostly, it's over-the top promotion. International star architect... I don't think so. They have better coverage than this:.....(list of links posted)...
Comment: @Vexations Your feedback on this matter appears emotional and misleading. Some links were not included in the "Mario Kleff" article others mentioned as "dead links", which is a dismal judgment. To refer to a heading without further reference to its content is like judging a book by its cover. You have made a personal comment, it is a non-neutral editorial style.

If this hurts you, please accept my sincere apologies. Regards Meow2021 (talk) 13:30, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Dismal judgement"? Dead link is the common term for URLs that point to a resource that is not or no longer available and generate a HTTP 404 error. There is nothing emotional in my use of the term. "judging a book by its cover" is a blatantly false. I went through all the references and read them in their entirety. "You have made a personal comment". No I didn't. I said I didn't think that "International star architect" was correct. If that wasn't clear enough, it means that Kleff does not come close to the real "star architects", such as the people listed in Starchitect, for whom there is no shortage of coverage in independent, reliable sources. And no, it is NOT a "non-neutral editorial style" to go through all the sources and see if they actually support the claims made in an article, and if those sources are generally considered reliable by the Wikipedia community, based on their use in other articles. I don't need or want an apology, I want a retraction of false claims you made. Vexations (talk) 22:12, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vexations You are presenting yourself emotionally and in a demanding manner. If you are not satisfied with my feedback and offer, I cannot help you. Regards,Meow2021 (talk) 02:14, 12 August 2021 (UTC) Note: I am not the author of the references used in this article, I am the author of the article.[reply]

I disagree, Meow2021, they not being emotional or demanding. Vexations has been very patient and their request for you to retract the false claims is completely understandable. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:34, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing of other people's AfD comments

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --- Possibly ☎ 21:37, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Possibly for explaining how to behave on a discussion page. However, I have not deleted or edited any comments from other participants, only responded to the proposed information in chronological order. I will be more careful. Regards, Meow2021 (talk) 02:14, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We don't do what you did, which was to render Vexations' comment unreadable. So yes, you certainly did edit their comments. In general, you respond after the other person's signature. Breaking into their text to add your own comment within their post has the effect of destroying whatever meaning they were conveying, and is considered disruptive and is unacceptable.

On another point, would benefit from dropping the combative attitude. Experienced editors like myself do not leave comments like this unless there is a problem. To be a better editor you have to learn the norms here. Thanks. --- Possibly ☎ 02:26, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You also wrongly-used Template:Talk quote inline when interjecting rebuttal comments (the action of adding rebuttal comments was referred to as "refactoring"); the guidance for using this talk quote template ( {{tq}} ) states: "... is used on talk pages ... to highlight a short excerpt of quoted material of other editors' comments or from an article or source.". It is not intended to be used to highlight your own original words. I realise you would not know this. An example would be: ...the latter account has the same name as the stated wife of MK (wife was educated to University level in England, IIRC, from recently-past research).. Those are my words, quoted here from another page. I have made the text clickable to target the original diff (when it was added to the original page-sequence).--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 11:15, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zire Wongamat Tower A

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zire Wongamat Tower A, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Silverlake Vineyard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silverlake Vineyard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silverlake Vineyard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:34, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wongamat Tower for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wongamat Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wongamat Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--- Possibly ☎ 06:43, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zire Wongamat Tower A is included in the same discussion. --- Possibly ☎ 07:00, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zire Wongamat Tower A for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zire Wongamat Tower A, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wongamat Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for undisclosed conflict-of-interest or paid editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=There seems to be a misunderstanding. I'm not related to any company, person, or place I've written articles about. I stood by and helped clear up the matter. There is no payment from anyone to create articles. In fact, it was a lot of work for me to complete the articles as there is little to no information in the press in the Chonuri area, so I sourced as best as I could.}}

. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:00, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Meow2021 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

'There seems to be a misunderstanding. I'm not related to any company, person, or place I've written articles about. I stood by and helped clear up the matter. There is no payment from anyone to create articles. In fact, it was a lot of work for me to complete the articles as there is little to no information in the press in the Chonuri area, so I sourced as best as I could.'

Decline reason:

It is clear from your contributions that you are not being honest with us. You are claiming copyright on images that are clearly on a private site and commercial in nature. You are either commercially involved with the projects or lying about copyright claims. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 03:17, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Thailand Dragon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thailand Dragon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thailand Dragon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Netherzone (talk) 23:49, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andromeda (skyscraper)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andromeda (skyscraper), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mod Dam 1199 R for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mod Dam 1199 R is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mod Dam 1199 R (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Netherzone (talk) 23:25, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of tallest buildings in Pattaya

A tag has been placed on List of tallest buildings in Pattaya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

No evidence in sources of topic meeting WP:NLIST.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:09, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Riviera Monaco moved to draftspace

Please refer to log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:46, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of tallest buildings in Pattaya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Pattaya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Pattaya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:16, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andromeda (skyscraper) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andromeda (skyscraper) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andromeda (skyscraper) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Netherzone (talk) 23:10, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Burapa Bike Week

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Burapa Bike Week, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:34, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Riviera Monaco

Hello, Meow2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Riviera Monaco, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]