User talk:Memohwiki

This is Memohwiki's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 50mMidas (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:50mMidas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:32, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Memohwiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:32, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 50mMidas (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

One source is dead, the rest are primary. If no body has taken notice and written about this in reliable sources then it is probably not notable and won't be accepted. Further submittals without vastly improving the sourcing will be met with an outright rejection with no option to resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:50mMidas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 07:05, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm Btspurplegalaxy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Technoblade have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 09:00, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dottedline snake eel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. You participated in the hijacking of the article about the Dottedline snake eel by moving it to the name of an organization. Do not do this again. StarryGrandma (talk) 00:10, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hijacking articles

Please do not overwrite pre-existing articles even if the subject you are trying to write about has the same name. Instead, add a disambiguator in a format following this example: The Vach (organization) Roost ^T_C(please ping me when replying) 12:08, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Memohwiki,

Hijacking a long-standing article to use the page for a subject that you have a COI with is disruptive. Do this again and you will be facing a loss of editing privileges. Start your own articles in Draft or User space like your Sandbox and submit them to WP:AFC. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sandstein 10:53, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Memohwiki. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 12:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:50mMidas

Hello, Memohwiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:50mMidas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:50mMidas

Hello, Memohwiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "50mMidas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:05, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]