User talk:Melissaburner

Proposed deletion of Donnabella Mortel

Hello, Melissaburner. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Donnabella Mortel, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 19:11, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Donnabella Mortel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donnabella Mortel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donnabella Mortel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ubiquity (talk) 19:46, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kevin L. Walker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin L. Walker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin L. Walker (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

You seem to be associated with the actor Kevin Walker and his recent film.

When you created an account on Wikipedia, you agreed to the Wikimedia Foundation's m:Terms of Use, which require you to disclose publicly any conflict of interest you have if you are editing in a paid capacity.

If you have any association with the subjects you've been wriiting about, then you are prohibited from further editing until you have provided proper disclosure. Please do so as soon as possible. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are completely incorrect in assuming i know this person personally. I simply chose a username. Wikipedia seems to be filled with bullies and "wikipedia gods."

Your contribution history, and the fact that you created a sockpuppet account to continue editing articles related to Kevin Walker (for which you are now blocked), _and_ the fact that your edits have a promotional tone to them, strongly suggest that you have a conflict of interest. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]