Hello, Melba1! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 03:11, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File copyright problem with File:Dr Elizabeth Garrett Anderson.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Dr Elizabeth Garrett Anderson.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
I've moved the image to the commons, and taken care of the Public Domain licensing. Thank you for contributing to the encyclopedia, and happy editing. blurredpeace☮02:40, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
{{helpme}} I would like some help with improving my new page about 'Female surgeons'
which is in my sandbox) and preparing it for publication.
Melba1 5th July 2009 Melba1 (talk) 08:19, 7 July 2009 (UTC) Melba1 (talk) 08:22, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article at present does not have sufficient sources to support the information given, and therefore it is not suitable for inclusion on the live Wikipedia.
A topic must have "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. See WP:GNG for details of this. The present references are not about the actual topic of the article, so they do not constitute 'significant coverage'.
(edit conflict)
Hi - I noticed you were looking for reliable sources for the article you are writing on Female surgeons. I had a quick search and came across some articles which may or may not be useful to you:
Carpenter, Louise (2009-03-08). "'Yes, I've got ovaries but I'm very alpha'". The Observer. Retrieved 2009-07-08. It takes a particular kind of person to survive the macho world of the operating theatre - and to write a book about it. Louise Carpenter meets surgeon and author Gabriel Weston
Stark, Jill (2009-01-11). "Queen of the cutting edge". The Age. Retrieved 2009-07-08. Interview with Wirginia Maixner, the third female to join the Royal College of Surgeon's neurosurgery program, and the first to run the Royal Children's Hospital
Goodchild, Sophie (2008-02-27). "Drive to attract more women into surgery". The Evening Standard. I haven't found a copy of this article freely available yet, but I have access to the full text through my work. A quote: "Figures obtained by the Evening Standard show that there are only 364 female consultants in Britain out of a total of more than 6,000. The Royal College had set an "ambitious" but "realistic" target of next year to increase the ratio of women surgeons to one in every five. Brain surgeon Helen Fernandes, who chairs the college's women in surgery committee, said the pool of medical talent was declining because female graduates were not applying for jobs in surgery. Ms Fernandes, the first female surgeon recruited by Addenbrooke's Hospital in Cambridge, said: "Women are ruling out surgery at an early stage because they wrongly believe it's too difficult to succeed. There are still pockets of chauvinistic behaviour but the reality is that women are their own worst enemy."{{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
I got these results with a LexisNexis search and a journal search for "female surgeon". I've only gone back to 2005, so I imagine there is more information available. All of them should be accessible to anyone (apart from the ones noted above). From the quick read I gave them, it seems like some of these might support the statements in your draft article, while others might provide additional information. I hope that some of them might be helpful to you. Please let me know if you need more information, or if any of the links don't work etc! --Kateshortforbob12:32, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
PS. I've taken the liberty of altering your "Help Me" notice to show that your query has been replied to. You can always re-add the Help Me template to this page, or ask questions at the Help Desk.[reply]
[User_talk:Kateshortforbob|forbob] Excellent help, thanks Kate!! I am just starting to learn the ropes, as you can see :-) Melba1 (talk) 05:29, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Someone with scientific credentials needs to write a page on the "oxygen paradox", namely, that oxygen is essential to most forms of life, but is also poisonous in certain forms and concentrations.--Melba1 (talk) 01:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
I've moved your request for help here, to your own user page - we like to discuss 1:1 on your own page, and keep article talk pages for discussions between editors, re. the article. For one thing, this way, you get an alert when I leave you a new message.
So - re. Oxygen paradox - I can't see any actual content in the page history, except your suggesting that 'someone create an article' - so, there's nothing to move to the incubator, from there, at least.
Incubation is for articles already begun; I don't see anything. If I missed something, let me know.
Otherwise, you probably want to start a user-space draft or something.
Use a {{helpme}} - please create a new section at the end of your own talk page, put {{helpme}}, and ask your question - remember to 'sign' your name by putting ~~~~ at the end; OR
(I have copied your question back here to your talk page - usually, I like to reply wherever the question was asked (which would be my talk, but in this case, I think it's better if I respond here, so you have the links, etc Chzz ► 08:41, 25 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]
First, I must ask - are you the subject of the article - or closely associated with the subject? If so, please read WP:AUTO - and I strongly recommend that you edit some other articles, before tackling the very difficult business of being neutral when you have a conflict of interest.
The biggest problem I see at the moment is a lack of independentreliable sources - brabazonarchive.com is a primary source, imdb is not a reliable source; the Independent piece is self-authored, and the others do not look independent.
I have added one 'fact' referenced to the newspaper, mostly to show how inline references work.
Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>
He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>
b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}";
== References ==
{{reflist}}
(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)
To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Melba1/reftest and try it out.
Chzz was born in 1837, <ref name="MyBook">
"The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009.
</ref> in Footown.<ref name="MyBook"/>
Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.
You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;
Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation
| last = Smith
| first = John
| title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century
| publication-date = 2001
| publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]]
| page = 125
| isbn = 0-521-37169-4
}}
</ref>
I also removed the heading at the top - that's not needed - and began with '''James Martin Brabazon''' (b. 18th February... - the three apostrophes go around the article subject, to put it in '''bold'''.
Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Mindaugas Piecaitis. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, without the risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. -- Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 17:01, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 17:05, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You have new messagesHello, Melba1. You have new messages at Chzz's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{user:chzz/tb}} template. File:Ico specie.png
OK, well, best of luck with it :-) And please do ask, if I can help further. If you can make it >1500Bytes (about 3 paragraphs) then it'll make a very nice entry for "Did you know..." on the main page - it has to be nominated there within 5 days of the article going live. WP:DYKS. Chzz ► 06:37, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Melba - I saw your post about this at Renata3's talk page. She's a very busy person... If you're willing (since it's in your userspace, I wouldn't do this without your approval), I'd be happy to work on the article. Reference formatting has given me a lot of grief in the past too, some of my edit summaries include @*$#!&$% -s, so I'm quite sympathetic to the problem. Thanks for writing it, as Chzz says it will make a nice DYK. I can cough up a couple more third-party refs in Lithuanian, here's one in English [1] with career details. Novickas (talk) 19:44, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'd love to work on it. Will start soon. Doesn't he look like the sweetest guy ever?
Hey, sorry for a late reply. I tend to forget things :) I will look into the article further. I found this bio, but do not have the time at this moment to dwell into it. Renata (talk) 16:56, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm personally avoiding putting any value judgements on the activities of GetUp!. Wiktionary defines partisan as "A fervent, sometimes militant, supporter or proponent of a party, cause, faction, person, or idea." Most of GetUp!'s activities would fall into the left leaning category. The thrust of my point was that since it is an organised group which involves itself in the political process (all be it not directly seeking political representation) it could be a categorised as a left wing group. We tend to like to put things into boxes, however in this case I think if the shoe fits then wear it. Ozdaren (talk) 20:18, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
To be a joinin' the fun and frolicks, yer can be addin' {{User:Chzz/pirate}} to the top o' yer talkpage / userpage for today, fer a fine fancy decoration. Emptied after midnight it'll be, so don't be dallyin' now!
Disclaimer: It's very rare for me to send messages like this; it might seem frivolous or hypocritical, as I often complain about myspacing of the project. However, as a pastafarian, this is my equivalent of a Christmas greeting. I seriously believe we need to have fun sometimes. If you object, I apologize; let me know, and I won't bother you again.
Hello Melba1, Thesevenseas has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I've looked through the references in the article and most of them seem to be intact (about four or five are broken links). The two "as of" statements clearly need to be updated, but that shouldn't be too difficult. I'm quite busy right now but I'll try to make a few changes if I have time. Thanks. --Jatkins(talk - contribs)15:25, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ulmus procera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royal Parade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chewang Norphel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watershed. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello, Melba1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I saw your edit to Talk:Microglia asserting that "females don't have microglia" and am wondering on what basis you make such an assertion. Did you mean that no female of any species has microglia?--Quisqualis (talk) 03:10, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Melba1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Craig Langdon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Banyule (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Hello, Melba1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Olive legless lizard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
