User talk:Mel Carter/Textbook Edit Sandbox
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
[edit]| Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:Joselv83 |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/16/2013 |
| Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Mel_Carter |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Mel_Carter/sandbox |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/16/13 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 05/16/13 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | N/A |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | N/A |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate to I/O Psych |
| Wikiformatting | Format is pretty good. |
| Grammar & composition | Good grammar. |
| Other comments | Good Job! |
Joselv83 (talk) 03:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
[edit]Name of student reviewer: Christina geo
Date of review: 5/15/13
Name of editor: User:Mel Carter
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Mel_Carter
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 5/13/13
Date review submitted to instructor: 5/13/13
Length of edit (too long/too short): Perfect length
Image (needed/appropriate): not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes
Wikiformatting: Correct formatting
Grammar & composition: Great grammar and composition
Other comments: Very nice format, clear, and straight to the point
--Christina geo (talk) 23:44, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
| Name of student reviewer ** | Wikipedia User: Angela Sandy |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/16/2013 |
| Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Mel_Carter |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.orf/wiki/User:Mel_Carter |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 5/16/2013 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 5/16/2013 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | The length is good. |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | No image needed |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | The textbook info is accurate |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | n/a |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | n/a |
| Wikiformatting | Bullets added |
| Grammar & composition | The grammar and composition is good. |
| Other comments | Good choice on the bullets |