Jump to content

User talk:Mehrshad Adkins 01

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Mehrshad Adkins 01! I noticed your contributions to Accident Man: Hitman's Holiday and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! VickKiang (talk) 02:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:03, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

[edit]

Copyright problem icon One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Knitsey (talk) 15:25, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the plot summaries from The Debt Collector (film series) and Lights Out (upcoming film) as the plot summaries are copied from IMDb. Knitsey (talk) 15:27, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Mehrshad Adkins 01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Accident Man: Hitman's Holiday, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Mehrshad Adkins 01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Debt Collector (film series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mehrshad Adkins 01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Debt Collector".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:41, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Take Cover (film) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Take Cover (film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 02:36, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read

[edit]

I moved Take Cover to draft for a reason, it wasn't ready for article space. You not only posted it back, but did so by copy-and-paste, despite being warned above about that. Looking at your editing, do you have a conflict of interest? If so, you must declare it, and you mustn't move (yes, move) the draft without submitting for review. It's unlikely that a film not yet released meets the notability criteria for films anyway Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:05, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diablo (upcoming film) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Diablo (upcoming film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has few sources and Notability not established - see WP:NFF. Incubate in draft space until the film is released.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 10:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Take Cover (upcoming film) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Take Cover (upcoming film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 07:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diablo (upcoming film) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diablo (upcoming film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diablo (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 16:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Day of Reckoning (upcoming film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and is too soon. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 02:18, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Day of Reckoning (upcoming film) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Day of Reckoning (upcoming film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Day of Reckoning (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Snowycats (talk) 03:07, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Death March (upcoming film) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Death March (upcoming film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and per Wikipedia:Upcoming films, it should not be published until the film enters principal photography. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Reconrabbit 15:41, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Film notability

[edit]

Hi! I wanted to give a bit of explanation as to why your film articles keep getting nominated for deletion. The long and short of it is coverage.

All films, regardless of release status, must establish notability by way of in-depth coverage in places Wikipedia would see as independent and reliable. Notability is not inherited by way of the cast and crew - having notable people act in a film can make it more likely that a movie will gain coverage, but it's never a guarantee.

To be honest, most films will only be notable once they release and get reviews from reliable sources. Sometimes, rarely, a movie can gain enough coverage for its production to be considered notable, but this typically only happens for very mainstream, well known films. In all my years of making movie articles for Wikipedia, I think I've really only had a handful of movies with enough production/filming coverage to pass WP:NFF. Announcements that a film will be made or that a given person is attached to star, direct, or produce isn't going to be enough. You can read more about film notability guidelines in this pamphlet.

I also want to caution you against moving articles live before they are ready. Not only will the pages be at risk of deletion, but it can also be seen as a bit disruptive if you move articles back before they're ready. Finally, I also notice that your name matches the last name of one of the movies you've written about. If there is a relation, please be careful about any potential conflict of interest. I fully understand wanting to write about someone you know (assuming this is the case), but sometimes it can result in the article being written in a non-neutral tone and it can be easier to feel hurt if something is nominated for deletion. I've known a good many people that I've wanted to create articles for, but couldn't for that very reason. (Notability was also a reason in some of these situations, admittedly.)

My recommendation would be to work on the articles at the Articles for Creation process (WP:AFC). It can sometimes take a while for articles to get reviewed, but I've found that film articles tend to get reviewed very quickly. I would recommend, however, that you use the film notability pamphlet as a guide before submitting something for review. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 19:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]