User talk:Megasteel33

Proud Sockpuppet of Megasteel32

November 2024

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kcmastrpc (talk) 22:57, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You cannot make contentious claims about a living person without evidence, e.g. that someone has been convicted for sexual assault. Additionally, you cannot make personal attacks, such as calling another editor a misogynist. If this behavior continues you will be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:52, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish The evidence is clear, only an internet search away. Calling someone a misogynist isn't a personal attack🖕 Megasteel33 (talk) 01:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:53, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Thanksgiving

With plenty of cornbread on the table (my favorite)! Randy Kryn (talk) 15:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning #2

Placing a Wikipedia username in pagespace without a reliable secondary source is both 1) original research, and 2) a crappy way to treat a fellow wikipedian. Some might consider it a personal attack, since it's likely to subject the user to trolling. Continue to chart this course at your peril. BusterD (talk) 15:43, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BusterD consider deez nuts a personal attack, lovely how that person will receive ZERO reprimand for trying to take down a wikipedia page. said person wanted a source, I gave them a source. how am I supposed to provide a secondary source about what happens on Wikipedia?? delusional. fuck off. Megasteel33 (talk) 16:32, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 19:45, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]