User talk:Megaride

Nomination of Maveryx for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maveryx is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maveryx until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:58, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Thank you for making a report about Maveryx (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:18, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Maveryx, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:22, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maveryx srl (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maveryx srl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Maveryx srl, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 09:43, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Megaride! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 09:43, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maveryx srl (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to meet WP:NCORP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maveryx srl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Maveryx srl, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 05:43, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Maveryx srl has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Maveryx srl. Thanks! 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 13:14, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Megaride. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Maveryx, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maveryx for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maveryx is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maveryx (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HouseOfChange (talk) 15:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Megaride, while the AfD discussion is proceeding, you can add useful material the version of the article that is being discussed. Remember, the article should stick closely to what reliable sources have said about it. It may just be WP:TOOSOON for Maveryx, and as time goes by more said the product and/or company will pass WP:GNG. If that happens, the article can be un-deleted or re-created. If it is any consolation, that happened to me -- an article I cared about (Suhai Aziz Talpur got AfDed in May 2018 but in November 2018 there was a lot more news about her, and the article was re-born. HouseOfChange (talk) 23:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@HouseOfChange: thank you for the advice (I will try to fix the article issues in the next days) and the consolation. --Megaride (talk) 20:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC) HouseOfChange, yesterday I added three thesis, from 3 different universities, to the Maveryx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) article's references, and few days before I wrote a statement in the related talk page to fix the COI issue. I did expect a reply to theese changes but today I just discovered that the article was deleted. No messages at all. Can you please help me understand what happened? --Megaride (talk) 15:07, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Megaride, I did not see your later additions, and the history of the article has been deleted together with the article. Recall that GNG requires "significant coverage". You can ask for a deletion review based on the fact that earlier !votes predated your new evidence. But with or without GNG, the article couldn't survive in its present form, basically a brochure for the product. I suggest instead you concentrate on getting some actual news coverage, even local coverage, for the product and the company--coverage that could count as RS for a future article. You can then ask for a deletion review based on that evidence. HouseOfChange (talk) 15:23, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maveryx Framework (July 8)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:NORG.

K.e.coffman (talk) 01:58, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@K.e.coffman: first of all, thank you for the review. Please can you give me more details about this rejection. The Maveryx Framework article submission is the result of the work I made after very long talk with other colleagues of yours. They gave me a lot of suggestions to complete the draft according to the WP:NORG, the COI, etc... At this point, I really don't understand what I'm missing or doing wrong. Can you please help me? --Megaride (talk) 14:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can ask for a second opinion at the Articles for creation/Help desk. Please click on the link: Articles for creation help desk, and it will take you to the right form. --K.e.coffman (talk) 23:23, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Maveryx Framework

Hello, Megaride. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maveryx Framework, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maveryx Framework

Hello, Megaride. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maveryx Framework".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:58, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]