User talk:MegaBulborb

January 2016

Please do not delete or flag potential "spoilers" in Wikipedia articles, as you did in the article Rewrite (visual novel). It is generally expected that the subjects of Wikipedia articles will be covered in detail, and giving a section a title such as "Plot" or "Ending" is considered sufficient warning to the reader that the text will contain revelations about the narrative. Deleting such information makes the article less useful for a reader who is specifically trying to find out more about the subject. For more information, see Wikipedia's guidelines on spoilers.

Also, per WP:LEAD, the lead section is meant to be a summary of the entire article, so of course it's going to have at least a brief overview of what the plot is about. To drive my point even further home, I'll even quote WP:SPOILER: It is not acceptable to delete information from an article because you think it spoils the plot. Such concerns must not interfere with neutral point of view, encyclopedic tone, completeness, or any other element of article quality (for example, the lead section).--十八 23:00, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rewrite (visual novel). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. --十八 23:01, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that removing spoilers in articles (which includes revising them to become less clear to readers, particularly to people who intentionally read Wikipedia in order to learn about the plot) is contrary to Wikipedia:Spoiler, which has the status of a guideline. Such edits, as mentioned in the aforementioned page, may prevent articles from providing a sufficient overview of the topic. Plus, determining which information can be considered "spoilers" requires judgement based on the editor, which may run afoul of our policy on neutral point of view. If you wish to continue to make your edits to the article, please first discuss on Talk:Rewrite (visual novel). Continuing to make the same edits without consensus may be considered disruption and can lead to a block. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 18:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]