User talk:Meeepmep/Archive 1

Meeepmep, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Meeepmep! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Tonkinese Rifles

Hello Meeepmep. I think that there might be a minor error in the caption of the excellent photograph that you have posted in the above article. Sources indicate that it was taken in Monastir, Macedonia, not Monastir, Tunisia in 1917. This is supported by the visible snow, the east-European appearance of the onlookers and the fact that colonial troops from French Indochina are known to have served in Macedonia, though not in North Africa, during World War I. Any objection to my changing "Tunisia" to "Macedonia"? Regards Buistr (talk) 20:00, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Meeepmep. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Air raids on Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nemuro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soviet politician Lazar Kaganovich.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nazi infobox image sizes

I have reverted a number of your edits changing the sizes of pictures of Nazis in their article infoboxes. The purpose of an image in an infobox is to help the reader to identify the subject, not to glorify the subject by presenting the image in a very large image.

I would like to remind you about WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the recommended next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss the dispute on the article talk page with other editors, but not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring, a disruptive activity which is not allowed. Discussion on the talk page is the only way we have of reaching consensus, which is central to resolving editing disputes in an amicable and collegial manner, which is why communicating your concerns to your fellow editors is essential. While the discussion is going on, the article generally should remain in the status quo ante until the consensus as to what to do is reached.

Please do not revert these changes, which were the result of a discussion between editors. Instead, start a centralized discussion about them somewhere and put links to in on the other articles' talk pages. Beyond My Ken (talk) 10:56, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're still doing it. Please stop. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:53, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:General Wei Lihuang (2).jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:08, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Meeepmep. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hugo Kraas

Hi Meeepmep, this was a strange edit: [1]. It restored a deleted template and a deleted category, among other things. --K.e.coffman (talk) 08:02, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for help

Hello,

I noticed that you edit from the mobile site and that you can write in a Chinese script, so I was hoping that you could help me. The mw:Editing team has posted some ideas about improving the editing experience on the mobile site at mw:Visual-based mobile editing/Ideas/October 2018. Could you look through that and tell them which ideas you like best (or least)? It's really helpful for them to hear from experienced editors who are familiar with the challenges of editing on the mobile site.

Also, from the userboxes on your user page, you might be interested in editing at w:yue:. Thanks, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring notification

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gotthard Heinrici. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:20, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gotthard Heinrici, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Kiev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Query about uploads at Commons

Hi Meeepmep, you have recently uploaded a number of WW2-era images at Commons: [2], such as:

Judging by the composition, style, and subject matter, some of them appear to have been taken by Heinrich Hoffmann (photographer). What makes you think that these images are in the public domain? --K.e.coffman (talk) 03:01, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would appreciate an answer still. --K.e.coffman (talk) 04:53, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, sorry for the late reply. If any photo that I've uploaded violates copyright, I'm fine with having them deleted, but I still think that those photos are public domain because they were taken such a long time ago. Do you have any definitive proof that the photos were indeed taken by Hoffmann?--Meeepmep(talk) 17:30, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - The burden is on you to show that the images are in the public domain; you cannot copy files that you find on the internet and upload them to Commons. The files should be tagged for speedy deletion as copyright violations. Do you know how to do that? If not, I can show you how. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:07, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Soviet politician Lazar Kaganovich.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Soviet politician Lazar Kaganovich.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nikolai Kardashev.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nikolai Kardashev.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of B-29s in front of Mount Fuji

Hi, As the Air raids on Japan article is a featured article, and I'm developing the article on the 9/10 March bombing of Tokyo to FA standard, the photos included in them need to have good quality metadata which demonstrates their relevance to the topics. I've seen similar photographs published with captions stating that they were taken after the war - B-29s were used in show of force flights over Japan after the surrender, and were based there in large numbers during the Korean War. Can you please also add alt text for the photos you're adding? The other images in the articles have this, and it's regarded as best practice for FAs. Nick-D (talk) 06:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heinz Guderian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Front (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heinz Guderian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southwestern Front (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Massacre in Ciepielów, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ciepielów (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Contributions/218.252.46.29

I'm curious if this is your IP address. Please let me know. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:37, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geʽez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:51, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kleist

Hello I just noticed that there is a problem in von Kleist bibliography but I am not able to fix it regards --Gian piero milanetti (talk) 17:21, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello, I'm Jack90s15. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk.@Meeepmep: That was not constructed at all There is no need to remove sourced material and restore a lead is 2 years old Jack90s15 (talk) 20:41, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wilhelm Richter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hirschberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Otto Skorzeny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SOE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So much is confusing...

See my comments at Talk:Heinz_Guderian#Allegiance. Nothing wrong, it's just that what's right looks wrong. (sigh) Shenme (talk) 03:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hugo Kraas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Selk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Herbert Gille, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gandersheim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:48, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Standschütze Hellriegel M1915, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Entente (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Portrait of Irène Cahen d'Anvers

Hello, Meeepmep. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Portrait of Irène Cahen d'Anvers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Barbarossa

Hey -- I undid your edit and then looked again and realized the Hunger Plan was briefly discussed in the main body. Your edit was not controversial, but it did not need to be cited as that content is elsewhere in the text and does not constitute something that might be contested. Anyway, I just want to touch bases with you. Also, going forward, if you are going to add content to a well-sourced and uniformly substantiated piece, you should follow the citation style of the rest of the page.--Obenritter (talk) 19:48, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		A barnstar for you! for your good work on pages about the World War era NatriumGedrogt (talk) 23:18, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 12:35, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hunting with eagles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khitan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Józef Tusk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lechitic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hermann Göring

Hi Meeepmep. The image you restored was actually removed in this edit, not when I removed the copyvio from the Guardian. — Diannaa (talk) 03:37, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Japan–South Korea trade dispute into Shinzo Abe. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uncle from Another World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barron's.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jisaburō Ozawa

Hi there and happy holidays! I reverted your edits to Jisaburō Ozawa as they contradicted WP:BURDEN, which states "the burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material." Apologies! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:16, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IDF hostages

You reverted my edit here stating that there is no reported IDF hostages or that palestinian resistance didn’t claim to have any, which isn’t true at all, there many photos and videos of captured IDF soldiers and hamas did claim to have captured many including high ranked officers as well.

for a source, check this from france24: https://www.france24.com/ar/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%82-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%88%D8%B3%D8%B7/20231007-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%8A%D8%B4-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A5%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%A6%D9%8A%D9%84%D9%8A-%D9%8A%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%86-%D8%A3%D8%B3%D8%B1-%D9%85%D8%AF%D9%86%D9%8A%D9%8A%D9%86-%D9%88%D8%AC%D9%86%D9%88%D8%AF-%D9%84%D8%AF%D9%89-%D8%AD%D8%B1%D9%83%D8%A9-%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B3 Stephan rostie (talk) 13:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Probably a good idea to cite that then Meeepmep (talk) 13:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Japanese destroyer Akikaze into Gunichi Mikawa. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 02:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]