User talk:Medupdate

March 2022

Please read wp:forum, note as well that new posts go at the bottom of the page, not at the top. Slatersteven (talk) 14:47, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am gona add you need to read wp:or and wp:coi. Slatersteven (talk) 15:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Last but one warning, stop using wp:talk pages as your personal wp:soapbox tpo sput wp:or that has nothing to do with the tropic of the arfocle. Slatersteven (talk) 15:17, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair you have not been informed of DS, this will be your last warning. Stop. Slatersteven (talk) 15:23, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Slatersteven (talk) 15:23, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at CSS, you may be blocked from editing. Recent edits on web-tech articles consist of nonsense synonym replacements and addition of boilerplate. Artoria 2e5 🌉 14:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice

Hello, Medupdate. I see that you have received quite a few messages expressing concerns about your editing, including both messages which are still here and others which you have removed. Unfortunately, in my opinion some of those messages are not clearly enough expressed, so that you may not always be clear as to what problems are being referred to. For example, just telling you that editing "did not appear to be constructive", without saying why, does not appear to be constructive. On the other hand, some messages have been clear enough, but you don't seem to have taken notice of them. I offer you the following pieces of advice, in the hope that they may help you to avoid problems.

Firstly, please do take notice of warnings from other editors. So far you have never once made any response to any message on this page, and you have often continued to make the same mistakes that you have been informed of. You have certainly seen messages here, because you have removed some of them. If you are not clear what another editor is concerned about, ask, and if you believe that you do understand, but disagree, explain why, rather than just ignoring what has been said.

Of the various concerns which have been expressed about your editing, there is one which seems to be a major problem, so I will give some more detailed information and advice about it. I hope it may help you. As you have been told before, much of your editing is not in coherent English. Sometimes I can understand what you are trying to say despite your poor English, but quite often you have written things which are so remote from English usage that I really can't work out what you mean. For example, I just don't know what "CSS is designed to improve within improvement" is supposed to mean at all. In "A touchscreen or touch screen is the device screen electronic and programable assembly of both a press input ... and screen output of a touch-interaction technologically enabled on touchscreen mobile device" I have a general idea of what you are talking about, but I am not at all sure what you are trying to say about it. What is worse, when you posted that, you replaced earlier text which was in perfectly good English. In another edit you replaced the word "scale" with "scality". As far as I know there is no such word in English as "scality". I have never come across it, nor is it in any of the dictionaries where I have searched for it. However, even if it does exist, or if you mistakenly thought it existed, why did you choose to replace the existing word "scale"? What was wrong with it? It's a common word understood by anyone with a fair knowledge of English.

In view if what I have just said, it is open to question whether your grasp of English is adequate for you to be editing an English language encyclopaedia at all, and it is certain that you should not be doing so in ways which involve addition of any substantial text. Even more so, you absolutely should not rewrite existing material to try to improve it, because time and time again you have damaged articles by replacing perfectly good English with garbled and incoherent attempts at English.

If you make a change to an article and another editor reverts it, please do not restore your version, or one substantially similar to it, unless both of the following apply:

you understand the reason why your editing was reverted (if you don't understand, then ask);
you are certain that your version is an improvement;
you explain why you are convinced your change is an improvement.

I see that you have been fairly briefly blocked from editing. Please do take everything I have said seriously, because if you continue as you have been doing, before long you will be blocked for a much longer time, probably indefinitely. JBW (talk) 22:16, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for disruptive editing..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 17:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - this is further to JBW's comments above. You have continued editing our articles to make them substantially worse, in terms of clarity and basic points of grammar, than they were before you got there. This cannot continue. I have blocked you from editing articles, but you are still able to contribute to talk pages. If you identify some changes you want to make to an article, you can request a change on its talk page and, if other editors agree, someone will make the change. Thank you. Girth Summit _(blether) 17:21, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]