User talk:Mediati74

July 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tones and I has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tones and I was changed by Mediati74 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880066 on 2020-07-16T19:37:48+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:37, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article for Deletion discussions

Hello Mediati74, I notice that you've recently nominated several articles for deletion, but without explaining why you believe that they don't belong on Wikipedia. Deletion nominations are used when editors believe that an article doesn't meet the criteria for inclusion: for one or more reasons outlined at WP:DEL-REASON.

Before nominating an article, it's always a good idea to carry out the checks listed at WP:BEFORE. If, after doing this, you still believe that there's a valid argument for deleting the page, the best way to do so is to follow the instructions set out at WP:AFDHOWTO, including writing your reason for the nomination: this will ensure that the nomination is created properly and that other editors can all contribute to the debate.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page if you have any questions. Regards ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 09:41, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User renaming

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mediati74 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Amanda Mediati (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

moving a user

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mediati74 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is unnecessary and understand you have been blocked for and the block is no longer necessary

Decline reason:

You still have not address the reason for the block, no what you would do to prevent your account from being blocked again. In short, this unblock request tells nothing. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:09, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mediati74 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is not necessary and will not continue to cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia and understand you have been blocked for, Mediati74 is blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because for abuse of editing privileges, you will only be able to edit your user talk page

Decline reason:

You are blocked for sock puppetry. You should address this reason. PhilKnight (talk) 15:20, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've revoked talk page access for this account due to the repeated nonsensical requests. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:24, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]