User talk:Mediateamnews

Thanks to Jimy from somewhere. for this. Mediateamnews (talk) 10:15, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COI username notice

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Mediateamnews", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:20, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

= Thanks for letting me know, but it is not a company nor any organization, it is ony a wiki name because when I adopt, it was mediateam that wiki did not accept because as media team already existed. When I changed it as mediateamnews, it was accepted so I do no thn it is against the policy i it is still objectionable I will try to change.Thanks. Mediateamnews (talk) 14:12, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zarb-e-Sukhan (Kulliyaat) (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AaqibAnjum were:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Zarb-e-Sukhan (Kulliyaat). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article hardly talks about the kulliyaat for specifically. A few more books have been described here, which don't come under the premises of the subject. Hence, the article either should be merged with its main subject i.e. author of Zarb-e-Sukhan or that, this page is improved and the book is defined in specific. --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zarb-e-Sukhan (Kulliyaat) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zarb-e-Sukhan (Kulliyaat), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 20:44, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mediateamnews! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 20:44, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zarb-e-Sukhan (Kulliyaat) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zarb-e-Sukhan (Kulliyaat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zarb-e-Sukhan (Kulliyaat) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 09:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Justice007, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Saqib (talk) 09:18, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. v/r - T P 14:44, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]