User talk:MediaEditNZ

Welcome!

Hello, MediaEditNZ, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
Simplified Manual of Style
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard is warmly recommended)
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Ask questions at Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Happy editing! Sam Sailor 00:32, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you ready for editing?

The

Adventure

Hi MediaEditNZ!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by Sam Sailor 00:32, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:100 Day Renovation, from its old location at User:MediaEditNZ/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sam Sailor 00:32, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 100 Day Renovation has been accepted

100 Day Renovation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 01:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 100 Day Renovation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 100 Day Renovation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100 Day Renovation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 12:10, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

100 Day Renovation moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 100 Day Renovation, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (100 Day Renovation) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 100 Day Renovation.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Considering there was an AfD on this waiting until it had actually premiered seems like the right thing. However, since 9 Mar is only 5 days away it seems silly to move it back to draft. Please remember we have WP:NODEADLINE and so if the article had been made, in a better version 10 March or 19 July that would have been OK too.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Barkeep49}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Barkeep49! Understood :) --Media Edit NZ (talk) 21:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, MediaEditNZ. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Praxidicae (talk) 15:31, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Praxidicae. No COI. This information was online but seems to be gone now. I have removed the relevant info and just content based with the sources. Thanks! --Media Edit NZ (talk) 18:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain your uploads to Commons then? Thanks. Praxidicae (talk) 18:31, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Praxidicae. I saw these on the Flickr account. They are linked through to them. Thank you. I have cut down the article, no need to have the tag there now? Thank you :) --Media Edit NZ (talk) 18:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
On another note, how do we remove this tag? I can assure you, there is no paid editing happening. At all. Completely not the case. Please cut down the article in this case to what works. I thought I already did that, but you reverted it? --Media Edit NZ (talk) 19:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rachel Hart, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. SamHolt6 (talk) 22:23, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks SamHolt6. I understand. I made it clear to why the tag should have been removed, but was placed back onto the article. Understand. I have no idea how to resolve this issue. Nobody is being clear or helping. Again there is no payment or conflict of interest. BUT however. I understand why it has been tagged. --Media Edit NZ (talk) 00:41, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rachel Hart for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rachel Hart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Hart until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:50, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stripe media

just a follow-up question. I know you say you have no COI, but do you have any connection to Stripe media? Work for them, know them etc? Because it's not hard to draw the conclusion that you must have since there are many detailed uploads and edits related to Stripe media and its TV products in your edit history. And the articles are promotional. There's also a very similar account called [MediaSpyNZ] supporting Stripe Media-related articles. I am finding it hard not to conclude that this is promotional editing, because these are clearly promotional edits.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:17, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of MediaCheck (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:00, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:29, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]