User talk:Medellin fa

Welcome!

Hello, Medellin fa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Jawid Safi did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Dl2000 (talk) 22:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jawid Safi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:10, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

this user Medellin fa make wiki for himself on anothers person name! (with photoshop photos + please chek the photos), Jawid Safi And Javad Safaee Is 2 Person! The Fake Person Javad Safaee Try To Make A Wikipedia For Himself With Another Name, The Photo Of Article Is Photoshop And Fake >> https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Jawid_Safi AND https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Mehrab_Hossain_(Mehrab_Naabi) 23:31, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with Jawid Safi. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 23:34, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Javad Safaee Is A Fake Musician With Fake Sources BUT Jawid Safi Is A Real cricketer, Javad Safaee Try To Make Many Wikis In Another Wikis But Cant: https://ss.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javad_Safaee

And now he try to make a wiki for himself under another person name, just chek the photoshoped photos...

Their team also try to make wiki for another persons too, Please chek the history of this link: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Mehrab_Hossain_(Mehrab_Naabi)

NoToFakeEdit (talk) 23:45, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 23:53, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Your recent editing history at Jawid Safi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 00:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Medellin_fa reported by User:Airtransat236 (Result: ). Thank you. Airtransat236 (talk | contribs) 00:30, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Jawid Safi) for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 00:30, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:NoToFakeEdit

A tag has been placed on User:NoToFakeEdit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This user page was not created by the user himself.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Airtransat236 (talk | contribs) 02:04, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Aryankhodakarami per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aryankhodakarami. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- RoySmith (talk) 03:43, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]