User talk:MedEds2023

This is MedEds2023's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rhonda Patrick (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All of the sources are primary sources, i.e. what Rhonda Patrick has herself written (either about herself or her research). What Wikipedia needs is evidence that she has been the subject of significant secondary coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rhonda Patrick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MedEds2023! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rhonda Patrick (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rhonda Patrick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 12:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francisco Nogales (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

Article reads like a resume or a tenure application. Person is likely notable, but this prose, and this complete lack of secondary sourcing, prevent its entrance into article space.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Francisco Nogales and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 17:25, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your reply; I appreciate it.

Could you clarify your comments about secondary sourcing? There are multiple secondary sources cited. MedEds2023 (talk) 17:34, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where? This has come up before, on this very talk page. I wonder if you know what secondary sources are. Another thing: please read WP:COI and disclose any conflict of interest you have. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 20:08, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Drmies. I do appreciate your follow up and helping me learn.

Based on the criteria identified for secondary sources, I viewed sources like the Ramon Y Cajal award as well as the World Health Organization citations as relevant secondary sources. Is that not accurate?

I also reviewed the conflict of interest guidelines and have none to declare.

Thank you! MedEds2023 (talk) 20:59, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is not accurate. If your subject contributes to some WHO manual, then the WHO can never be a secondary source to report on that. Please review Secondary source. I mean, seriously. The man works for the U of Granada, and you are citing a U of Granada webpage, and you are going to call that a secondary source? Surely a person like you, with an academic background, should know better than that. Drmies (talk) 23:01, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rhonda Patrick

Hello, MedEds2023. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rhonda Patrick, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Francisco Nogales

Hello, MedEds2023. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Francisco Nogales, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Francisco Nogales

Hello, MedEds2023. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Francisco Nogales".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]