User talk:Mecklenburg98

Mecklenburg98, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mecklenburg98! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Minor edit facility

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Pinkbeast (talk) 17:48, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to NEET—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 10:33, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Drunken Peasants. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Drunken Peasants was changed by Mecklenburg98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950659 on 2019-11-16T10:40:12+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:40, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Drunken Peasants, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 11:27, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understand

July 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Boerboel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 20MAY20 you posted a scientific study to support a made-up bite-force figure, and that study made no mention of this dog nor did it list any breed-level biteforce figures. William Harristalk 09:13, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what the hell your talking about, but the misinformation in the article was appalling if wikipedia is to be taken seriously...900 psi biteforce? Who the hell pulled that one out of there ass? I fixed it, and but what the Cape Town Encyclopedia's had documented Mecklenburg98 (talk) 01:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the Deal...The best Option In the Boerboel Articles case is minimum information...Its a 360 year old breed that has only been recognized by the general public outside of South Africa for maybe 25 years, and The dogs Reputation for Strength and being a "Leopard killer" turned into it being a Lion eating lovecraftian Demigod...Many mentions of old accounts of them are old Forum Forgeries, and the actual information that can be found on its history is vague, or was written in an autobiographical Anecdotal context...Only Cape town had kept any legitimate historical writing on the history of the dog Mecklenburg98 (talk) 01:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With a breed shrouded in so much mystery, anecdotes, and misinformation...I'd just lock the damn article...All I did was try to clear up the bite force nonsense, and clear a few things up, with 2 sentences from what the university of cape town concluded Mecklenburg98 (talk) 01:43, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your claim of not knowing what I am talking about, this may refresh your memory: here You were the editor that posted a scientific study that did not even have a Boerboel among its specimens, nobody else did. William Harris (talk) 12:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thats why i asked who came up with that number...Indeleted the BS American breeder claims...I explained to you the Boerboel is to rare/was unknown to most of the west until the last 15 years, so the only history we have on it is from cape Town Mecklenburg98 (talk) 02:52, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]