User talk:Mechanismtongs

This blocked user (block log) has asked to be unblocked. The reason given is: the block was asked four by the vandles listed above, furthermore i believe it was motivated by personal gain Administrators: Do not unblock (unblock link) without discussing the matter thoroughly in advance with the blocking admin; see WP:BLOCK. If there is no legitimate reason to remove the block, please leave a note to that effect on the user's talk page. Remove this template once you're done. Blocked editor: If the block message says that your IP address is blocked or that your IP address was recently used by a blocked user, please paste the block message or post your IP address below as we have no way of unblocking you if your username itself was not blocked.

Thanks for your concern - oh and as a matter of fact i DO watch south park :-). Nice to know we something in common. --David 16:27, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go to Jedi-Order.blogspot.com. Go to the your say icon on the right.Loook at i think the first talk open for discussion. Maybe we will have more in common--Mechanismtongs 17:11, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's that supposed to mean? The only thing there is a hit list of people who you have branded 'enemies', one of them being me! --David 17:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i thought you would like to know your phone number will be published on the internet. However we can prevent this for a price. Lol. No we dont know your number anyway, but if james asks...... i would say no--Mechanismtongs 17:30, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen your main pages history, by "I Love David Comley". --Mechanismtongs 17:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That was reverted and the account has been blocked. --David 17:38, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hook

Hey, just of interest, why did you feel the need to say that hook school was in hook? It just sounds a little unnecessary (that’s why I reverted it last time). --David C 15:57, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I thought it just told wikapedians where the school was. If that is alrite with u. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mechanismtongs (talk • contribs)

Fair enough, but dont you think the names "Hook Junior School" and "Hook Infant School" indicate that they are located in Hook? --David C 18:36, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No u must be precise and give facts.--Mechanismtongs 18:14, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but what you have done is just unnecessary and a waste of server space. --David C 19:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look, how about a compromise. I have removed the words "in hook", but added the phrase "in neighbouring Odiham" under Robert Mays so that it is clear that it is not located within the village, and also eliminates the need to state the location of the primary schools. I know its a little bit "Chewbacca Defense" but if it solves this edit war then so be it. --David C 19:52, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

its not a war, thats making a mountain out of a molehill. The fact is that i am right--Mechanismtongs 16:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way you obviously have no idea how to use pictures in wikipedia. Attempting to add captions by simply typing them is naive, stupid and screws up the image. If you want to edit the summary in future i suggest you refer to the tutorial. --David C 19:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

((helpme)) I would like an administrator to block David Comley, because he has just called me "naive" and "stupid". Therefore he should be blocked. he is openly criticising me.

One warning only

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to User:DarthBinky, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. --Pak21 13:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to User:David Comley, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Ale_Jrb 13:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. To contest this block, please email me or place {{unblock}} on your page, including an explanation why you feel the block should be removed.

NawlinWiki 14:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request.

Request reason: "This is against my European human rights, law 45. I have turned a new corner and now see the possibilities of contributing wikipedia. Give me a trial, i will NOT do vandalism"

Decline reason: "Declined for repeated vandalism despite numerous warnings and past blocks. You've used up all your chances with this account. Also, Wikipedia isn't an European government, and we're not gagging your right to free speech in public, only on this website after you've proven that you can't be a cooperative member of this community. -- Netsnipe ► 16:43, 6 September 2006 (UTC)"[reply]

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

"Article 45 - Reasons for judgments and decisions

1.Reasons shall be given for judgments as well as for decisions declaring applications admissible or inadmissible. 2.If a judgment does not represent, in whole or in part, the unanimous opinion of the judges, any judge shall be entitled to deliver a separate opinion."

This is in reference to the Grand Chamber, not Wikipedia Hut 8.5 16:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|U just quoted, "only on this website after you've proven that you can't be a cooperative member of this community", however i now want to be a co-operative member of the community. Give me the chance or your own comment is false.}}

Your request to be unblocked has been denied for the following reason(s):

Forget it.

Request handled by: Lbmixpro 18:48, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove this template from your page.