User talk:Meaghan1234

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 15:35, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Judy Collins. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. TN X Man 15:56, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 15:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Meaghan1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that only posting external links is an inappropriate use of Wikipedia. These external links were not intended to be advertisements. They contain further accurate and on-topic information that could not be added to the article due to copyright. If unblocked, I will make productive contributions to Wikipedia pages by adding valid information to people's pages, such as biographical and interesting facts that have not been posted yet.

Decline reason:

Declined due to lack of response to the questions below. Max Semenik (talk) 19:29, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since you obviously have a conflict of interest regarding that link, I can unblock you only if you agree not to add it, ever. Agreed? Max Semenik (talk) 15:13, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd prefer to see a commitment not to edit pages relating to things and people affiliated with American Program Bureau. Toddst1 (talk) 20:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]