User talk:Cupoftea155

This user may have left Wikipedia. Cupoftea155 has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Cathy Schoen

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cathy Schoen, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.commonwealthfund.org/about-us/experts/schoen-cathy.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:19, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cathy Schoen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cathy Schoen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.commonwealthfund.org/about-us/experts/schoen-cathy. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 14:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Big Kap.jpg

Hi. Do you have any rights for this photo? Tashi _{Talk to me} 01:13, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No I do not. I just found it elsewhere on the internet and decided to put it here. I'm not sure if that means it will get deleted or not.MeAsAPerson (talk) 01:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi MeAsAPerson! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:07, Friday, February 5, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Proposed deletion of Raphael Schumacher

The article Raphael Schumacher has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established, fails WP:NACTOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 00:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raphael Schumacher for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raphael Schumacher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raphael Schumacher until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WWGB (talk) 04:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#GA reviewer

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (confer) 00:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, though I imagine you meant to help, your reviews were not even close to the level they needed to be. It is clear that you do not understand the GA criteria and how to review an article based on them, especially as you nominated one article for GA, Big Kap, that is a 927-character Stub, which is as far from a GA as you can get, and then proceeded to review seven articles for GA in 38 minutes. That simply isn't possible; 38 minutes would be questionable for a single review, much less seven of them.

We have had to unwind all seven of your reviews. I strongly recommend that you gain a great deal more experience on Wikipedia before attempting any further GA reviews—another couple of months at least—and that when you do you ask for a mentor to guide you (you can ask at the GAN talk page, WT:GAN, when you're ready). Thank you for your understanding. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. I did not realize that it would become such a problem. Where we're going, we don't need roads. (talk) 14:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Ahrweiler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Captain of Koepenick. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of disambiguation

Hi, I not include speedy deletion becouse without discuss it is unfounded. There are three relevant pages in this disambiguation, no two. I have made a typo. Dawid2009 (talk) 18:20, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis Meyers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stress. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Adam Gontier, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:38, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jennifer Copping for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jennifer Copping is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Copping until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 21:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WBUN-CA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Low power. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Al Mulock

Hey there.

So, I learned that the guy who played the one-armed bounty hunter committed suicide.

I noticed they didn't put the day of May when he did that.

Out of curiosity, I looked it up on Google.

A few sources said that it was May 1.

So, I figured I would let you know where I got them from.

98.162.137.30 (talk) 15:38, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks for letting me know. Can you list the sources so that I can tell that they are reliable? --Cupoftea155 (talk) 15:40, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They are Pathetic Facts and Fanpix.

98.162.137.30 (talk) 16:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fanpix is created by fans, and Pathetic Facts sounds more like an website than an reliable source. So no, they are not reliable. --Cupoftea155 (talk) 16:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:03L 2016 5day.gif

Thanks for uploading File:03L 2016 5day.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

clock tower

Why did you move my sandbox to AfC if it isn't a new article? It doesn't need to be reviewed. I was just working on it in my sandbox to improve it there then was going to overwrite the article. Is it preferred to use drafts for stuff like that? TarkusAB 22:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, didn't mean that. I thought it was an draft of a new article and then I realized a article of the same subject exists... --Cupoftea155 (talk) 22:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh well can you please undo this because I would like to keep my sandbox history. Thanks for interrupting my editing. TarkusAB 22:23, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cupoftea155. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who like NationStates

Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 06:32, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WBUN-CA for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WBUN-CA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WBUN-CA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CentralTime301 (talk, contribs) 17:05, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]