User talk:Mcrodgers2

Welcome!

Hello, Mcrodgers2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! HighInBC 22:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:VirusBurst_Offer.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:VirusBurst_Offer.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:34, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SmitFraud for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SmitFraud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmitFraud until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 18:34, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "Spoilers"

This is Wikipedia. Just because it hasn't aired in one time zone doesn't mean it can't be posted on the wiki. Besides, if people didn't want to be spoiled before watching it, why in God's name would they be on the wiki page for said episode? So just stop. Please.

Booyahhayoob (talk) 06:26, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This kind of thing has been discussed extensively in the past. Please see WP:SPOILER. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 13:17, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Vinegar. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 16:46, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to David Caplan

Who is David Caplan? In the section, "Argument in favor of shooting fleeing felon" states a quote by David Caplan. Even in the footnote citation link David Caplan is not identified. There needs to be some reference to this person's identity.