User talk:Mcklosk

Vernon François moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vernon François, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mcklosk, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mcklosk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vernon François

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vernon François, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:36, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vernon François

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vernon François, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — fortunavelut luna 13:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alex Shih ^Talk 15:18, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, your account appeared to be connected to Factfinder85 and RainbowDash0. Please note that illegitimate use of multiple accounts are not allowed, thanks. Alex Shih ^Talk 15:18, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

blocked?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mcklosk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Alex, The page I've been trying to make is legitimate, not promotional and has multiple references. I'd ask that you compare it with the page for the hairdresser Nicky Clarke whose only references are the Daily Mail and the Daily Star. The Vernon François page is very similar in regards to clientele and having appeared on TV as referenced. Can you enlighten me at all? I also found a pre-existing mention of him on another wikipedia article which I linked back. Article here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Britain_%26_Ireland%27s_Next_Top_Model_(cycle_8).Thanks. Mcklosk (talk) 16:47, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you honestly think that blatant marketing speak like "François works with children, young people and parents to encourage positive attitudes to and perceptions of textured hair" is not promotional, or that it is even remotely suitable for an encyclopedia (click that link if you don't know what one of those is), you have no place here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.