User talk:Mchavis
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Mchavis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! EvergreenFir (talk) 06:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
I'm sorry if I worded my believe in how wikepedia is alot of opinions and adding stories and it's based off who can manipulate more ways to make the story believable.something for you to know, for you to know that wikepedia is the main tool the democrats used to lie and change the facts . I get my facts from fact finder. It's alot of manipulation and adding and taking things out. So these words are someone else's words and thoughts or is this tool used to put in their mouths . So you use the media, articles , past history of of an individual or situation and use all this for your version of the story. Let's use Morgan freeman as an example ok!! Famous actor. Unfortunately after doing my research and comparing facts from the rewritten and edited statements and just random added statements was just crazy. It's funny how easy it is to reword and edit someone's words and don't have video of the facts . Is there a video or proof that he is racist or an Atheist?! Let me give you the fact!! He is not rascist! And he is not an atheist!! His statement in his own words were quote, unquote that living with faith allows you to believe that there is a higher power and the gift of believing in something you cant see is powerful enough to go beyond . Mchavis (talk) 09:16, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
December 2020
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 08:44, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Discretionary Sanction Notification
[edit]Not sure how necessary this is, but...
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
EvergreenFir (talk) 06:23, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
December 2020
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. EvergreenFir (talk) 15:35, 19 December 2020 (UTC)