User talk:McTools

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Paktia Province has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Captain panda 23:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmm... After thinking about it, maybe your version is right. You can ignore that post I just made above. Captain panda 23:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, McTools! I am Compwhizii and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 23:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re

plz read her biography http://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=SilviaLancome/gender=f/Silvia-Lancome.htm

http://www.mediapartpro.com/EN/estrellasVer.php?estrellaID=12

it says there she called herself Miss Afghanistan. why did you remove that?

here it says she is half afghan http://www.moviefilmfest.com/pornlist/starpgs/Silvia_Lancome.htm

I did read the short bio and it states that she is slovakian not afghan. One of her alias name is miss afghanistan but she isn't from afghanistan.

it doesn't say she is half afghan. It says she was born in slovakia to an unknown afghan and slovakian parents, it still means she is slovakian. Those sites where you gather information from are unreliable becuase they are blogs in which anyone including you can edit http://www.porn-stars-blog.com/blog_list/starblogs/Blog_Silvia_Lancome.htm

im not repeating now

the article about her is from moviefilmfest

the blog link you showed copied it

Her nationality is slovakian and her ethnic background is caucasian (white/european). You're also mistaken those sites are blogs editable by anyone.

what about her name Miss Afghanistan? why did you remove that? it is in every website

check imdb http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1162976/

fixed it

ok.

you should also add her ethnicity, Caucasian is race and european is just continent

she is half afghan or she wouldnt call herself miss afghanistan

If you find trusting info indicating that her father was born in afghanistan then she may be considered "afghan descend" but still she doesn't qualify as afghan because the term afghan means a citizen or an inhabitant of afghanistan.

you wrote that she is not from afghanistan. we dont know that she might be born in afghanistan

you should remove that sentence.

She was born as Silvia Krivosikova, which would mean that her father is definitely slovakian http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1162976/bio

Silvia Lancome

Please read WP:CSD before making such poor CSD taggings. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please avoid edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Beh-nam. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Kingturtle (talk) 15:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've filed the latest checkuser at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Beh-nam and I added some new information regarding the suspected sock puppet but he removed my added info so that he doesn't get blocked. Since I'm unable to revert again you would need to do it so that the checkuser proceeds.--McTools (talk) 17:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Make your case on the talk page. Thank you for avoiding an edit war. Kingturtle (talk) 18:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anything I post there will most likely be removed by Jalalalabadi or its ips. If you don't push back his last revert at the checkuser then there will be no check done because he removed it from the list.--McTools (talk) 18:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not true. Discuss it in the talk page. It will be read. Kingturtle (talk) 18:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote my argument on the discussion board at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Beh-nam and am thinking now to file an online complaint with the local police station that serves his address or the university where he visits. May sound silly at first but he left behind an entire 2 years' statements from which police can determine what type of person he is.--McTools (talk) 19:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What law is being broken? Kingturtle (talk) 19:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For starter, helping to distribute pornagraphy online and if I look into it I am sure I'll find something that will be enough to get him arrested. If you really see the new laws on cyber crimes, they are very ridiculous and you may be arrested for just about anything.--McTools (talk) 19:44, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Read this before you get yourself banned

Wikipedia:No legal threats. Also check all of the contributions of Beh-nam and all his other accounts. He was never a vandal. He contributed a lot to Wikipedia and without him Afghanistan-related articles would not be as good as they are. He single handedly wrote many great articles such as Hazara people. He did get himself banned, but it was unjust because he was not aware he could potentially violate a rule on just one of his edit. Still, he was accused for "proxying" and then banned. They were too hard on him and should not banned him for just one edit that they considered "proxying". In short, please check his contributions before calling him a vandal and you should also avoid breaking rules of Wikipedia or otherwise you could be banned for a stupid reason just like Beh-nam was (Wikipedia:No legal threats). — Preceding unsigned comment added by KonarPashtoon (talk • contribs)

I reported someone to the administrators and they will decide what action to take. I didn't post threats to anyone, read Wikipedia:No legal threats again so you can have a better understanding of what it's saying to you. If you want to return as a civilized editor you gonna have to change your behaviour completely and ask administrators to allow you back, but most likely there will be strict conditions. look around you inside Wikipedia, do you see others behaving in the same manner as you? You won't find that many of your kind here.--McTools (talk) 20:55, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cacasian

does not mean European,it includes north africa, western asia, and south asia. it includes Afghans. see Caucasian race.

That's race but her ethnic is European ethnic groups.--McTools (talk) 19:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, she is not one of those ethnic groups. She is either Slovak/Afghan mix or pure Afghan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.247.2 (talk) 19:28, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care what she is but her name check shows that she is slovakian and there are many women from that part who look like her. Even in Ireland and England there are many people with black hair and slightly darker skin.--McTools (talk) 19:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IAFD AFDB do not have her last name listed as that. If that was her real last name they would have it. So that is probably a mistake by IMDB.

highly unlikely.--McTools (talk) 19:35, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm giving up on reverting those edits, The admin's won't believe my story on the User being a sock of that banned user. Momusufan (talk) 22:48, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your try and don't feel bad I'll take the time to report them for 3RRs. I believe it's 2 persons from the style of writing.--mCtOOls 22:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I made a checkuser case Here. Momusufan (talk) 23:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

142.150.72.115 is the banned person for sure, online at the Univeristy of Toronto in Ontario, Canada. http://samspade.org/whois/142.150.72.115 It's a college computer area where students get online: Computing and Networking Services, Address: 4 Bancroft Avenue Room 121B City: Toronto)--mCtOOls 23:28, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beh-nam socks confirmed

These socks that were reported a few days ago, FCBarsalona, Shinwarii, and Barakzai are all are confirmed socks to Beh-nam. Momusufan (talk) 14:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Be civil. Kingturtle (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

McTools (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not a confirmed sock puppet and my case is still pending at Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#NisarKand_16_March_2008

Decline reason:

[1]. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 21:44, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To elaborate a bit further on that, a checkuser confirmed that it was "likely" that you were a match. While that alone is not enough to confirm anyone as a sockpuppet, the pattern of your contributions, and your evasive and dishonest defense in the checkuser case, solidify the case against you. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:01, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I filed the checkuser on myself after kingturle accused me.[2] That shows that I was not evasive or hishonest. The pattern of my contributions are totally different from the pattern of nisarkand's so what are you talking about? Administrators often make mistakes by labeling wrong people as sockpuppets [3].--mCtOOls 23:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

McTools (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can someone look at Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#NisarKand_16_March_2008 again, do you see the clear mistakes of administrators that were pointed out by thatcher? She or he confirms that khampalak and nisarkand have no relationship, which was previously tagged as nisarkand's sock puppets by nishkid64. So 2 or more people cannot edit wikipedia if they live in the same city? nisarkand's edits were all concentrated on afghanistan but mines are not. I may know him or live in the same city but I haven't carried out any work for him. I have many other friends in my city who come online and chat online, and some also edit wikipedia. I don't visit the same pages as those visited by them. I see administrators cross the line and make clear mistakes, and they don't even apologize for their mistakes. Where is the fairness and understanding?

Decline reason:

The case you linked to referred to a different account, NangOnamos. This account "McTools" was marked as "likely" in the closed case just underneath— Daniel Case (talk) 13:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--mCtOOls 23:23, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Runner (1999 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Runner (1999 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Runner (1999 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Film Creator (talk) 23:43, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]