User talk:McGrandWizard.

A switch from my previous Username of

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:GrandWizard

McGrandWizard. 16:39, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Mykungfu (talk • contribs • block log • creation log). As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

Reasons for unblocking

MrDarcy is the individual who has blocked me. I have switched the use of my sn from GrandWizard. Prior to my switch as can be noted on my my previous username MrDarcy had some kind of problem with me for an unknown reason. Please refer to the talk page here for further information. Thank you. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:GrandWizard . I am also wondering as to why my complaint [1] concerning links that are copyrighted material on the Alpha Phi Alpha article [2] has been removed by MrDarcy which is clear violation of Wiki policy concerning the linking of copywritten material. [3] McGrandWizard. 20:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC) McGrandWizard. 20:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why can't i make a request for unblocking? Why was this deleted? http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMcGrandWizard.&diff=98300007&oldid=98000615

McGrandWizard. 11:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Piece of advice

A piece of advice: Put your reason for the request in the unblock request. When an admionistrator sees the reason for unblock as being reason, he/she is less likely to deal with you. Eli Falk 13:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

see below was placed

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

McGrandWizard. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

See Below

Decline reason:

Seriously, Mykungfu (talk · contribs), you have been permanently banned from editing Wikipedia. -- alphachimp 08:31, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

McGrandWizard. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

Please follow the instructions for the template, Mykungfu, and then someone will address the matter. Thank you. -- ➨ ЯEDVERS 20:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why do you keep referring me to Mykungfu? I have no association with that username. McGrandWizard. 20:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons for unblocking

MrDarcy is the individual who has blocked me. I have switched the use of my sn from GrandWizard. Prior to my switch as can be noted on my my previous username MrDarcy had some kind of problem with me for an unknown reason. Please refer to the talk page here for further information. Thank you. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:GrandWizard . I am also wondering as to why my complaint [4] concerning links that are copyrighted material on the Alpha Phi Alpha article [5] has been removed by MrDarcy which is clear violation of Wiki policy concerning the linking of copywritten material. McGrandWizard. 20:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

McGrandWizard. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

MrDarcy is the individual who has blocked me. I have switched the use of my sn from GrandWizard. Prior to my switch as can be noted on my my previous username MrDarcy had some kind of problem with me for an unknown reason. Please refer to the talk page here for further information. Thank you. I am also wondering as to why my complaint concerning links that are copyrighted material on the Alpha Phi Alpha article has been removed by MrDarcy which is clear violation of Wiki policy concerning the linking of copywritten material.

Decline reason:

I can see plenty of screams of "admin abuse" but little information that I can act on that would suggest an improper block. If you can provide diffs that are specific (rather than the very general ones you have so far given that also suggest a dutiful admin acting correctly, rather than someone on a mission) then I can review. But until then, your edits so far and your response don't give me anything to work with, so perhaps you might like to take this as the parting of the ways between you and Wikipedia. Either way, your choice. Thanks. ⇨REDVEЯS 21:53, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

McGrandWizard. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

MrDarcy is the individual who has blocked me. I have switched the use of my sn from GrandWizard. Prior to my switch as can be noted on my my previous username MrDarcy had some kind of problem with me for an unknown reason. Please refer to the talk page here for further information. Thank you. I am also wondering as to why my complaint concerning links that are copyrighted material on the Alpha Phi Alpha article has been removed by MrDarcy which is clear violation of Wiki policy concerning the linking of copywritten material. Also please take a look at my reasons for unblocking below.

Decline reason:

See response below. -- 〈RED VEЯS〉 19:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reasons for unblocking

MrDarcy is the individual who has blocked me. I have switched the use of my sn from GrandWizard. Prior to my switch as can be noted on my my previous username MrDarcy had some kind of problem with me for an unknown reason. Please refer to the talk page here for further information. Thank you. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:GrandWizard .

I am also wondering as to why my complaint [6] concerning links that are copyrighted material on the Alpha Phi Alpha article [7] has been removed by MrDarcy which is clear violation of Wiki policy concerning the linking of copywritten material.

Also please take a look at this "I'm looking at this an i'm confused. So a checkuser was brought by mrdarcy? why? he said if i needed any help to see him. [8] . this is really confusing. i said i didn't want any help [9] , so he accuses me of a violation? should i simply not use aol? that is the safest browser for me. my behavior follows a pattern? can you tell me what the pattern is? [10] because for the most part i do simple additions and did some research on a few things. Stacey Dash and Barry Bond's primarily, thanks. McGrandWizard. 00:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

McGrandWizard. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

see above. no justifiable basis for blocking me except for administrative abuse by MrDarcy.

Decline reason:

The sockpuppet evidence is very persuasive. You editing patterns are often unhelpful in the way you deal with other people. When asked for a reason to unblock you - something, anything - you respond with a repeat of your unjustified claims of unspecified abuse against a respected user. It hink we're done here, aren't we? -- 〈RED VEЯS〉 19:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.