User talk:Mazonka
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
Talkback
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
—UncleDouggie (talk) 04:59, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Hasq
[edit]Hello Mazonka,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hasq for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. DOCUMENT★ERROR 06:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- I've moved your page from the article name space to User:Mazonka/Hasq, in light of the fact that you said you're still working on it. Good luck on the article. TomStar81 (Talk) 10:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- As per your request I've restored and speedily deleted the article on its original csd grounds. TomStar81 (Talk) 12:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- What request? Someone else started to fill the page in, but you deleted it??? I do not understand.Mazonka (talk) 13:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- The way our policies and guidelines are written stipulate that the article in its current form either be speedy deleted for one for the various reasons given, nominated for deletion via the afd process, redirected to a more suitable page, or userfied so that an editor can come up with a version that works here. After a review of the article and your contested deletion post, I opted to move the page so that when a version was created that could stand in the article space it could be returned there for more people to read, edit, and expand. If you want the article back in the article space as it was then its gonna be deleted, but if you want a copy to put in the draft or user space you can work on the article unmolested by other editors until it reached a point it could stand alone. If you'd like your article back, I'd be happy to restore it for you but it would have to be in your userspace. TomStar81 (Talk) 13:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, please restore it to my user space. The link might be necessary from the article space as other people have to be able to find it in order to work on it. My personal opinion is that I disagree with both reasons given for deletion, but I did not have a chance to address them. Mazonka (talk) 13:38, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- I'm happy to restore the page, but I can not leave a link in the article space to point to the page in your userspace, that goes against wikipedia's policies. If the article is restored to your userspace it will be made available for you and you alone to work on. TomStar81 (Talk) 01:16, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- The page is not there. Have you restored the page? Mazonka (talk) 06:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- The page is not there. Can you please restore the page? Mazonka (talk) 11:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Done. TomStar81 (Talk) 20:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]Unspecified source/license for File:Cryptoleq Processor.jpeg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Cryptoleq Processor.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:45, 6 March 2018 (UTC)