User talk:Mayashamcdonald8818

Welcome!

Hello, Mayashamcdonald8818, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 23:52, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Monuments Men Foundation for the Preservation of Art. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 23:52, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Your addition to Monuments Men Foundation for the Preservation of Art has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:40, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Monuments Men Foundation for the Preservation of Art has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing.— Diannaa (talk) 01:20, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You also created a second account (Arthistorian411) to avoid scrutiny when a block for copyright violations was likely if you continued, which you did. That is a violation of our policy on the misuse of multiple accounts (WP:Sock puppetry). Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content if you intend to apply for an unblock.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 14:10, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Small text== UTRS 29230 ==

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Mayashamcdonald8818 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #29230 was submitted on 2020-03-01 18:36:48. This review is now closed.

~!Deep fried okra talk

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mayashamcdonald8818 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made an error as I did not understand the puppetry guidelines. My assistant made an account arthistory411 from my laptop to edit the same page as I did not realise this would cause a problem. This will not happen again. I also tried to correct my copyright errors as best as I could by including proper footnotes and indicating that text was lifted as instructed by the administrator. I will do better going forward and would appreciate having my block lifted as I meant no harm and am only interested in adding meaningful information to pages. Thank you for your time.Mayashamcdonald8818 (talk) 23:01, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

The answers below show an adequate understanding of Wikipedia's copyright policy. I will be monitoring your contributions, and will block you again if there's any further violations. — Diannaa (talk) 21:33, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You were not blocked for sockpuppetry; you were blocked for copyright issues. The sockpuppetry issue was secondary and would not result in a permanent block of your main account unless the problem was ongoing. Here are some questions for you to answer so that we can assess your understanding of copyright and how it applies to Wikipedia. Please respond to the following questions, explaining in your own words:

What is copyright?
How is Wikipedia licenced?
Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked.— Diannaa (talk) 01:32, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is copyright? The exclusive legal right over material granted to the originator for a fixed term

How is Wikipedia licensed? It is co-licensed under CC BY-SA and GFDL

Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia? Because it would violate the copyright of the current owner and could cause legal issues for Wikipedia - this is why information used should be in the public domain.

Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? If there is explicit permission from the copyright holder or by supplying evidence of non-infringement like hyperlinks to original sources which conform to the licence guidelines and gives credit to the authors.

How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future? By following the rules more closely and being mindful of the specific types of licences. I will also get in touch with the page administrator to confirm things I am unsure of before making the edit to the page.Mayashamcdonald8818 (talk) 12:54, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello Mayashamcdonald8818. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Monuments Men Foundation for the Preservation of Art, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mayashamcdonald8818. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mayashamcdonald8818|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:56, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Magnolia667, I am an employee of the Monuments Men Foundation for the Preservation of Art and had disclosed this a year ago when I began making edits to share the rich history the foundation preserves. I've added the aforementioned disclaimer to my page as you've instructed. All of my changes have multiple sources (like reputable news outlets) and do not rely solely on foundation pages or posts. Could you please add the Museum Network section back to the page? It was a laborious task to add each museum and several sources to support the addition. Thank you. Mayashamcdonald8818 (talk) 23:10, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at this edit I reverted, you can see you added:

"the Foundation launched the Monuments Men and Women Museum Network with the support of major international institutions".
"The Foundation launched the Monuments Men and Women Museum Network in 2021 under the leadership of President Anna Bottinelli".
"In 2021, the Foundation announced the launch of the Monuments Men and Women Museum Network".

There is no doubt your organization does important work, but the edits you have been adding are promotional. I would strongly encourage you to propose changes on the talk page of articles you wish to edit. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your position, but I do not believe that giving a full list of institutions that are participating in the Monuments Men and Women Museum Network is promotional. That is factual material that is related to over 20 museums worldwide. That is a core tenant of our foundation and to not have it included is to give people incomplete information. These are facts not promotions and the sourcing indicates as such. I would like to appeal this decision. Mayashamcdonald8818 (talk) 02:31, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mayashamcdonald8818. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 16:44, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]