User talk:Maxpax

Speedy deletion of Jessica Dougherty

A tag has been placed on Jessica Dougherty, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ShootinPutin109 08:41, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Lloyds TSB

Thought I should make up for my failure to leave an WP:Edit summary re: this edit - it looked to me like a "drive by" edit, inserting a partisan external link with some fluffy editing to disguise the EL. I'll bow to your familiarity with the article, though - it's been a while since I edited the article in any depth.

Cheers, TFOWR^{This flag once was red} 18:27, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Lloyds TSB has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. RaseaC (talk) 21:31, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you.Maxpax (talk) 21:44, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lloyds TSB

The article on Lloyds TSB is getting very negative. Please remember the wiki principle of NPOV. Are you you going to insert some positive material as well to ensure NPOV? Dormskirk (talk) 16:24, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I find some, yes, certainly. Maxpax (talk) 17:43, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your recent edits; the name of the retail bank in England and Wales is Lloyds TSB Bank Plc. Chrisieboy (talk) 11:25, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]