User talk:Maximmarch

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 16:58, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 17:07, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. -- ferret (talk) 17:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maximmarch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked on suspicion of being a sockpuppet for some user I have never heard of, without proof of any kind. I am asking to be unblocked so that I can contribute to the encyclopedia, as I am not a sockpuppet of that user Maximmarch (talk) 23:43, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It seems to me like there was plenty of proof. Following Scott Bell-Moss's block, your account was created and proceeded to immediately reinstate Scott Bell-Moss's edits – to the letter. ([1] [2] [3] [4]) You also removed an AN3 report for Scott Bell-Moss. ([5]) You'll need to address that in any unblock request. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 00:12, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.