User talk:Maxim5HT

Welcome!

Hello, Maxim5HT, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Comparison of web frameworks. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GermanJoe (talk) 12:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello. Your recent edit to Comparison of web frameworks appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 12:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ask for NITRO draft page review

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Greetings! Pardon my misleading. Could somebody review my Draft page contribution if it worth continue?

 Draft:NITRO (web framework)

I tried to cut as much advertisement as possible, leaved only published books, articles and announcements in open-source. Maxim5HT (talk) 13:47, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

While I'm not going to expedite your review based on a {{help me}} request, I can tell you that your draft appears to lack the sort of references needed to establish that the software is notable. The relevant guidelines can be found in software notability criteria. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:22, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From what I see it should satisfy:

It is reasonable to allow relatively informal sources for free and open-source software, if significance can be shown. For instance, Usenet posts may be acceptable sources for some guy's homebrewed Unix clone.[4] On the other hand, an app that is distributed commercially or supported by businesses is a commercial product. Sources used for such apps should satisfy the breadth and depth of coverage required for a standalone commercial product article.

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Maxim5HT. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:NITRO (web framework), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.
Is that first citation to a work written by you? — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the first one is my book.Maxim5HT (talk) 14:53, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. We can keep the conversation here.

The templates that you added to the draft are normally placed on a talk page, not on the draft itself. And it would be good for there to be a disclosure on your user page User:Maxim5HT, which does not yet exist. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kindly, will do.

Your draft article, Draft:NITRO (web framework)

Hello, Maxim5HT. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NITRO".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:50, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]