User talk:Max rspct/archive8
Request
[edit]Could you have a look at Vision Thing's reversions at Anarchism and Anarcho-capitalism? He is reinserting unnecessary detail without discussion. -- infinity0 13:20, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Btw, did you get my email? -- infinity0 14:50, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Do you have IRC? -- infinity0 15:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Edited vesion of Battle of Boyra
[edit]You inserted citation needed links to an articel about the battle of Boyra.
Flt Lt. Hakimullah's flight did not engage Sikhand, I am not aware whether he claimed him as a kill. PAF definitely treats this as an air-to-air victory for Hakimullah. Visit PAF archives for this, as this is not topic of discussion and only trivia. I have offered as support the contents of a web-page operated by a former Comssioned Officer of PAF, which I believe os satisfactory for the topic. The Indian Airforce awarded AVSM to Wg. Cdr Sikhand, recorded in the IAF's gallantry and awards web-page, again this is not the topic's object of information. Air support for Pak Army in the battle of Boyra came in the second day, this is a known fact, for the reference of which you have to go through the archives of the Indian and Pak Govts, and is as such not citable. However, I am sure newspaper articles of the time would suffice. Please add this if you're aware of this, but as this is not a court trial, not every fact is being referenced. Chaudhury claimed a Gnat shot down, this was claimed by PAF. If you read the description of the battle, in the article, you will realise that the engagement was over in a matter of minutes and the downed Pak Pilots did not have scope to engage in Dogfights, only Chaudhury did, and he was not downed. This does not need seem to be in need of a citation as this is a known fact. 14 sabres were captured by the Indian Army when Dhaka surrendered, I am not sure why you want a citation for this, but official web-sites of the BAF and IAF will corroborate this.
The point of the article was to offer insight into the battle and not build a court-case for a trial. I have therefore included trivia and accepted and known facts without citation
- If you have the references ..why don't you just put them in then? I did't ask for that many. --maxrspct in the mud 15:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
You wrote: "Welcome to Wikipedia. Please familiarise yourself with it (Wikipedia:Tutorial, Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines) . What you have been writing is a plain, straight-forward appeal on behalf of celebrity criminal Martha Stewart. It is not my job to guide newbies in assimilating POV and this sort of stuff into articles...If you really want to give her version of events - present one side of the case and then source it from source. Don't speculate or do original research. This is not a place to dispute the courts findings unless they are seriously questioned by notable professionals, law people and academics - go onto a message board for that. Don't present it as fact unless it is. Whether its from supporters of M.Stewart, memorial builders, conspiracy theorists, gurning fans of Natalia Vodianova or anything else - unsourced POV appeals and waffle get deleted - policy and practice. Good luck -- max rspct leave a message 01:28, 21 April 2006 (UTC)"
It is not unheard of in the history of jurisprudence for a court to reach an unjust finding. Witness, for example, the recent spate of exonerations prompted by the Innocence Project. Consequently, while the justice system does, and I suppose must, assume that someone found guilty by a court is in fact guilty, it is not reasonable for the rest of us to make that assumption; rather, it is quite reasonable and proper for us to reserve judgment. The points I made about Stewart's trial were factual, and not speculative. That I didn't state evidence supporting her conviction, does not mean I deny that evidence; it merely reflects that fact that such evidence is already attested and well publicized. Thus my statement was not "a plain, straight-forward appeal on behalf of celebrity criminal Martha Stewart" but rather an effort to balance the impression created by the court's finding, by stating certain facts. - Palmleaf
Hogeye evading ban (again)
[edit]Ever since anarchism had the semi-protect removed, hogeye started editing with IPs (probably open proxies) again. User:64.159.81.81 is the one I'm dealing with most right now. Others include User:217.160.230.161, User:Beeboe and User:FreeJohnG, as well as a few IP's that have already been blocked. I suggest semi-protecting anarchism again, and blocking all the socks. Also, keep an eye on American individualist anarchism, which is a POV fork created by one of the Hogeye socks a while ago. It currently redirects to Individualist anarchism in the United States, but hogeye readded their POV fork after I reverted it back to the redirect (calling me an asshole in their edit summary no less). Thanks. The Ungovernable Force 02:02, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Bakunin
[edit]I don't have any objection to your short version of the commentary on Bakunin's anti-semitism. In fact, I just tried to add a reference to the Dreyfus Affair as a turning point for European intellectuals and radicals on the whole issue of anti-semitism. As I indicated in my earlier post, I think the longer versions of the Bakunin anti-semitism commentary give undue prominence to his anti-semitic writings, and the quotes people keep using are not properly referenced, so it is not possible to independently verify them. There are shorter and verifiable quotes that show Bakunin's anti-semitism and anti-Germanism (for example, his denunciation of Marx as "a German and a Jew"). Robgraham 16:35, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Chevaline
[edit]I'm not really surpised that you are considering leaving Wiki due to harrassment if you mess with others carefully crafted work in such an apparently POV manner. Knowing that Chevaline is still politically contentious especially among the disaffected left-overs of the old hard Left I was especially careful in crafting this piece to avoid POV. There are numerous references cited some of which do indeed substantiate the text that you have tagged without doing your research. These include numerous Civil Service discussion papers for Ministers now in the public domain at the Public Record Office, and in the papers from the recent Royal Aeronautical Society symposium cited. And you might also be old enough as I am to remember the extensive press coverage of Comrade Khuschev's threats to obliterate the UK at the time of Suez. If you want to amuse yourself by playing silly, sad, old leftie games then do it without destroying others work. Please remove your tag. Brian.Burnell 12:29, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please do not leave pathetic, and stroppy personal attacks on my talkpage like that. That the USSR threatened to attack the UK alone with nukes (twice?) is a big claim. No I don't spend that much of my own time digging in in the PRO. If you have a source, SOURCE IT! POV? i just put a tag there. Please mind Wikipedia:No personal attacks and Wikipedia:Civility. Where source? source it! --maxrspct in the mud 12:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- The article is sourced. You simply couldn't be bothered to do the work to check the sources. Its not the job of other contributors to do your research for you. Brian.Burnell 13:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Don't start playing your violin at me! Maybe YOU should get thicker skin. For that claim in the article you must show the EXACT records as source.. not just a footnote. You did make personal attacks regarding my politcal persuasions and the note at the top of my page. I may take it off as it obviously attracts personal attacking from individuals who are looking to have ago at someone/something. --maxrspct in the mud 14:53, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]Thank you for your help in getting my block lifted. I really appreciate it! The Ungovernable Force 21:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Good example of the way this place works. - max
Dangers of Angostura Bitters
[edit]You wrote:
I seem to recall that it is lethal to drink this type of bitters unadulterated/from the bottle. I may well be wrong , can anyone enlighten? -max rspct 13:43, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- I gather that is just nonsense: there are no toxins there, it is just a matter of taste. If you can tolerate such a pungent bitter flavor and the high alcoholic content, then you can drink it. I did it as a kid (Yeeeeccch, never again!!!), and that was 45 years ago! But then, who would do that, and why? The keen flavors and subtle scents of Amargo de Angostura are enjoyed most as much as the benefits of Homeopatic medicines are reaped best: in small, minute quantities.
- Regards, AVM 21:59, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, I am still concerned tho.. as it was a hotel owner who told me.. A joke perhaps.. looking at the taste/bitterness of the stuff as u point out.--maxrspct in the mud 16:02, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Anarcho-capitalism as featured article
[edit]I have posted the anarcho-capitalism article to undergo a major review due to my belief that it is not up to the standards of being the best wikipedia has to offer. If you are interested in participating in the process please do. Blahblahblahblahblahblah 11:15, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Leonard Peltier Revert
[edit]G'Morning Max, I saw where you recently made a revert to the Leonard Peltier article, specifically to the opening paragraph. There had been a good bit of discussion, and agreement, concerning the intro on discussion page. Your revert returned the paragraph to the version which was essentially the cause of the debate, not the version upon which a consensus was reached. I am not trying to pick a fight, but I am curious what your reasoning was since you didn't leave a comment. Cheers! Cafe Irlandais 14:28, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- I disagree will your interpretion of the situation. The page is very much under debate and removing that tag and the other info isn't really proactive. --maxrspct in the mud 14:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- I believe we may be discussing two different "situations". I am referring to a very narrow and well defined one, specifically the structure and writing of the opening paragraph and the debate surrounding what makes a good opening paragraph, not the whole article nor the status of the debate regarding the larger issues of the page. Based on your comment I can see that I failed to adequately delineate between the two, and for that I apologize.
- The purpose of the edits to the introductory paragraph was to provide a concise overview that touches only briefly on the salient points that should properly be discussed in greater detail later in the article. That is the consensus to which I referred to my previous comment and why some info was removed from the intro.
- Is the page very much under debate? Sure it is, and the tag, as such, probably belongs. But that type of thing is not something that I try to involve myself in. Besides, facts properly sourced and neutrally presented tend to resolve those issues. Again, sorry for any confusion that I caused. Sláinte! Cafe Irlandais 22:01, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
This user drinks mate
[edit]I nicked your mate user thing. It's terrific. Hope you don't mind. Kudos. tyx
Userbox support
[edit]The userbox was deleted so You just had a bunch of red text there, so i deleted it. Sorry if You wanted it there.Cameron Nedland 16:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Image:Police raid protest april 20 06.jpg
[edit]Did you really create this work? I saw it in the Turtle Island News. Did you send it in? It looks like video, The Turtle Island News said that it was a frame of dramatic video. It's interlaced, did you shoot this? It says you are the creator, are you? Wuffyz 20:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- eh?.. no. well.. i manipulated it and uploadec it.. no copyright.. tag it with that if u want - i got it off the earlt external link on the Cal occupation. maxrspct in the mud 19:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:Circlea.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Circlea.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 19:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Howdy, I noticed that you and I seem to post in one or two articles dealing with progressive issues in political science/sociology. There's currently a debate beginning in Boston Tea Party as to whether the article should include the category [1]. It meets definitions set in the articles Terrorism and Definition of terrorism, however, there are several self-proclaimed patriots who watch BTP who refuse to recognise the fact. The simple criteria for terrorism generally seem to be intimidation or destruction of property in order to change public policy or public opinion while a state of war has not yet been declared. Some users would rather use recent acts of terrorism as a yardstick, rather than using a firm definition, and hence lose their ability to discuss matters calmly. Would you be able to pop in to the Talk page and join in the discussion? Thanks much, samwaltz 05:39, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Bruno-bbc.jpg
[edit]Hugo Chavez
[edit]Not sure why you are reverting referenced content, here. Please read the talk page. Sandy 13:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- OH really!!? "giggles" bit is sourced? - max
Anarchism
[edit]Can you explain your revert? -- Vision Thing -- 17:44, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure of who've added this part, but I guess that's obvious vandalism. What do you think?
--TheEgyptian 19:20, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Chevaline2.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Chevaline2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.
Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Udsieq 16:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Wizard (fantasy)
[edit]Because you have made comments on the Wizard (fantasy) talk page, I thought you might be interested to know of a Request for Comments: Talk:Wizard (fantasy)#Request for comment Goldfritha 02:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:AAFlight191 newspapers.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:AAFlight191 newspapers.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. We need to know which newspapers you got it from so we can know whose copyright this belongs to. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 02:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
I can't believe i have to dig that out again. --maxrspct ping me 16:59, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
copyvio at wheatpaste
[edit]I put the copyvio notice yesterday, and the site seems to have died in the last 24 hours, however the exact same recipe was available at the site, and that looks pretty much like a copyvio. The site can still be seen at googles cache [2]. Even if the site was to be dead for good, that wouldn't mean that is not a copyvio anymore, right? SpiceMan (会話) 18:18, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- YAWN.. its just simple wheat paste.. isn't the notice a bit too zealous? maxrspct in the mud 18:22, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Stop vandalizing/deleting sections of article
[edit]Could you please stop deleting the Murray Rothbard section out of Anarchism in the United States? Are you a vandal or do you have a legitimate reason for removing it?Anarcho-capitalism 20:36, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
He is not considered to be an anarchist. Go order someone else about mr evangelical original researcher - maxrspct ping me 22:43, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Of course he's considered to be an anarchist. Maybe not by you, but by almost all scholars. I just added a bunch of sources. Need more? There are tons more. By the way, you added Goodwin as a source for anarcho-capitalism being individualist anarchism (though apparently you thought you were putting her a source saying something else). Goodman doesn't explicitly specify that it's an individualist form of anarchism. She just say's a form of anarchism: "Although many anarchists today still subscribe to the values of Bakunin and Kropotkin, there are two new, divergent currents of anarchist thinking. One is anarcho-capitalism, a form of libertarian anarchism which demands that the state should be abolished and that private individuals and firms should control social and economic affairs." page 137Anarcho-capitalism 16:13, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
No.. either you have changed the wording or there are big differences in editions. It says right-wing libertarianism.. not libertarian anarchism. Read the last paragraph on that in her book. -- maxrspct ping me 23:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- That is an accurate quote above. She does say it's right libertarianism as well. There are two wings of libertarian anarchism, left libertarianism and right libertarianism. She is not saying that it's not anarchism. It is a right libertarian anarchism. By the way you shouldn't falsify the other sources. Do not claim that other sources say something they don't. Your honor 05:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
I would like to add an external link in Arabic Language
[edit]Hello Max,
I a French man, living in Toulouse, FRANCE. I have a passion for Arabic language, which I am learning. And to help me and help others in order to learn vocabulary, I have created a web site. I tried to make a link towards this site in "Arabic Language", but it was removed. And I don't understand why. So I made changes, but now I can't edit external link. I don't want to make spamming or advertisement, just to share my work :
../index_uk.php
Thanks a lot and happy new year,
François
User notice: temporary 3RR block
[edit]Regarding reversions[3] made on January 14 2007 to Anarchism
[edit]
Anglicization
[edit]I am reverting your recent re-Anglicization of an article about an American Airlines flight which crashed in the United States. According to the Wikipedia guidelines on the subject, articles about the U.S. would normally use American English. I see no reason why this should be an exception. --Orange Mike 23:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Dawsonfieldcamels.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Dawsonfieldcamels.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Anishinaabemowin language Userbox
[edit]Aaniin, with great effort from User:Miskwito, we now have the oj series of Anishinaabemowin language userboxes. On the WP:IPNA/Nish page, we have a matrix of the possible categories for the oj series and the major dialect groupings. You can now add to your Userpage one of the oj userboxes that are available or you can help create a userbox for the dialect of your interest. Please see Wikipedia_talk:Babel#Ojibwe_language_userboxes for the full discussion. Miigwech. CJLippert 23:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
MFD comment
[edit]Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Anarcho-capitalism. Comments requested. :) -- infinity0 01:58, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:Stauffenberg-signature-head.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Stauffenberg-signature-head.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ~~helix84 02:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Chavez sash.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Chavez sash.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:30, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Boleg oc.gif)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Boleg oc.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Max rspct. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Boleg oc.gif) was found at the following location: User:Max rspct. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Max rspct, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Boleg oc.gif) was found at the following location: User:Max rspct. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 09:23, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Its a free image offered out by the Partit Occitan. Please stop bothering me.. yea capitalist robot. -- maxrspct ping me 09:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Deletion of animated Occitania flag GIF
[edit]Image:Boleg oc.gif was tagged as {{Promotional}}, which means fair-use (publicity photos are fair-use, even if they're "free" as in "free beer"). Since it wasn't being used in any article, it was deleted because it was an orphaned fair use image. utcursch | talk 05:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Kevehs/Revkat
[edit]Hello, I saw that you left a message for me on my old user pages. I've a new alias now as I've lost the passwords for Revkat and Kevehs. Just wanted to let you know I'm back for the time being. Busy now with the libertarian socialism article. Cheers! Etcetc 19:42, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
I have answered your question about Engels and Buddhism, just after your question on the Talk Dialectics page.
Rosa Lichtenstein 15:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Curious
[edit]You've been around quite a while, so I assume that you're familiar with this. why then these edits? Are you on some campaign? Unschool 01:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- No. Thats the correct spelling. There is no S in criticize, american or british english. Mind Wikipedia:Civility. -- maxrspct ping me 01:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Operation Salaam
[edit]Hi Max rspct. You are off to such a great start on the article Operation Salaam that it may qualify to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page under the Did you know... section. Appearing on the Main Page may help bring publicity and assistance to the article. However, there is a five day from article creation window for Did you know... nominations. Before five days pass from the date the article was created and if you haven't already done so, please consider nominating the article to appear on the Main Page by posting a nomination at Did you know suggestions. If you do nominate the article for DYK, please cross out the article name on the "Good" articles proposed by bot list. Again, great job on the article. -- Jreferee (Talk) 18:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks very much - i've nominated it for 'Did you know' -- maxrspct ping me 20:01, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
|
On 6 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Operation Salaam, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Andrew c [talk] 20:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- What an interesting article - well done and thanks! Jasper33 07:27, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Good Catch
[edit]I have been watching the Marx article. I am glad some one caught the caught the error. Albion moonlight 07:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Please do not remove large chunks of referenced text without talk page discussion. Thank you. Intangible2.0 16:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- i've been talking on that page much longer than youooo! Unless you're a meat/sockpuppet ;-) -- maxrspct ping me 16:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Verklempts style and possible sockpuppetry
[edit]Go to the. Talk:Ward Churchill misconduct issues; page and read about a user named Getaway, he is a convicted sock puppet with astounding similarities in style and attitude to USER VERKLEMPT . My goal is to help bring an end to the disruption and have the Ward Churchill reopened and or protected from those who find consensus rehabilitating. Feel free to join in if you like. Albion moonlight 18:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- This is very funny. You are looking for allies wherever you can find them, aren't you Albion moonlight. So far your baseless allegations have gotten you no where. As far as I can tell all of the admins that you have approached for assistance have summarily rejected your outrageous and unsubstantiated claims. I'm going to continue to watch and work on ALL of the Ward Churchill articles and you are not going to be sucessful in your declared objective of silencing me.--Getaway 13:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Looking for allies is called seeking consensus. I have only contacted 1 admin. so far. He is the one that that confirmed that you have in fact used sockpuppets in the past. I have noticed that you have stopped being disruptive on those 2 pages. Thanks for that and please keep up the good work. If you can manage to do that there will be no need for anyone to deal with your disruption. I will respect Max's talks page by not having any further conversation with you on his page. Thanks again for for your cooperation. Albion moonlight 18:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- You sound as if I changed my behavior because of you. No are absolutely wrong. I have not changed anything. I'm still waiting for you to find an admin who will follow up on your wild, baseless allegations. Let me make clear that it is against Wikipedia policy for you to engage in threats like you have on this particular talk page. I ask for you to stop your threats. I have changed anything because of you and I never will.--Getaway 19:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Groovy. I'm already involved with the same pages as all. Albion, who's the admin? what other names/socks have been used? or do you want to wait to put it on a page?. -- maxrspct ping me 18:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
-Woohookitty is the name of the admin. The truth is out there. Oh yeah and heres a copy of my original communication with woohookitty his comment to me is on my talk page.
I think user Getaway has yet another sock or meat puppet. Verklempt is the name and disruption is the game he seem's to love to play. The similarities between the 2 is remarkable. This is not an official request for administrative intervention. It is a vocalized sigh of relief upon discovering that my suspicions are probably correct. I am working on gaining consensus amongst the editors of the Ward Churchill pages. If and when I call for a vote of some kind, (I am a newbie of sorts) I will use the normal channels to report suspected sock puppetry . But for now I am just testing the waters ,,,, Albion moonlight 08:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC) Albion moonlight 20:44, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- If they are the same account, and I have not checked yet, what are they doing which is objectionable? Fred Bauder 01:30, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
South West Africa People's Organization
[edit]Hey, Good edit to South West Africa People's Organization. Aside from npoving, that claim about SWAPO receiving funding exclusively from the USSR was just wrong. Regards, Perspicacite 07:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Cheers. SADF involvement in neighbours need checking in these articles. Lots of apartheid etc sympathisers on wkpia. --maxrspct ping me 21:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Liverpool
[edit]Hey Max rspct, i noticed your edits on Liverpool. I must say i agree with your edits, so please join me in the discussion on the matter, and feel free to discuss it with me on my talk page.(also please take note that the following contained a banned link on wikipedia which was stopping me from saving - "I would like to add an external link in Arabic Language
Hello Max,
I a French man, living in Toulouse, FRANCE. I have a passion for Arabic language, which I am learning. And to help me and help others in order to learn vocabulary, I have created a web site. I tried to make a link towards this site in "Arabic Language", but it was removed. And I don't understand why. So I made changes, but now I can't edit external link. I don't want to make spamming or advertisement, just to share my work :
THIS LINK
etc..
Jackrm 04:01, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Feel free to help out over here if you have time
[edit]
|
The Irish Republicanism WikiProject is a collaboration of editors dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of Irish republicanism, Irish nationalism, and related organizations, peoples, and other topics.
(For more information on WikiProjects, please see Wikipedia:WikiProject and the Guide to WikiProjects). |
--Vintagekits 21:20, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ok will do! -- maxrspct ping me 21:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
WP:Films Welcome
[edit]
Hey, welcome to the Films WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for June has been published. July's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.
There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
- Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
- Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Film Tasks template to see how you can help.
- Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!
- Want to collaborate on articles? The Cinema Collaboration of the Week picks an article every week to work on together.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 00:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Cruz La Nación Argentina al Heroico Valor en Combate
[edit]As silly as it sounds also in Spanish; that's the name of the condecoration. Check es:Cruz al Heroico Valor en Combate. --Mariano(t/c) 15:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hehe. Well.. thinking about it ..it does actually make sense in 'grandiose speak' since the Argentine Nation is giving the award to whoever exercised the heroic valour in combat. Hmm. --maxrspct ping me 17:29, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]I blocked you for 24 hours for violating the WP:3RR rule in Capitalism. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 19:04, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi Max
[edit]regarding the POV of the globalization section of capitalism, you have my support. Please keep me posted on developments.BernardL 20:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
RFC
[edit]It's exceedingly poor manners to request comment and then completely disregard it just because the comments you requested disagree with you. THF 21:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Wut u mean? I was the first to post and didn't get anything back for 12+ hours. I just posted 20mins ago anyway. Think. ---maxrspct ping me 21:46, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- You posted an RFC, I responded to the RFC on the talk page, consensus agreed with me, and then you reverted my edits without explanation, going back to edit-warring despite the fact that every editor to look at the issue disagrees with you. THF 21:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- No that was not the consensus. If at all it is not in your favour. --maxrspct ping me 09:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
August 2007 Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter
[edit]WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter August 2007
your question
[edit]My page was to tell people what my interests are, for better understanding in communications. In 4 wikipedia years I came to a conclusion that smart people don't really need it, while idiots don't care. After dealing with quite a few real jerks in the upper echelons of wikipedia strongarms I also decided that an appeal to any respect based on past contribs is fundamentally wrong. Power corrupts. `'Míkka 23:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
July 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
[edit]The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 19:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Noel Coward lyrics
[edit]I took the lyrics back out of Don't Let's Be Beastly to the Germans again - I've left a note to explain why on the talk page. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 12:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Reference tags
[edit]I always appreciate your efforts at keeping the Ward Churchill article less libelous. One thing though: if you add content with references, could you please use the <ref>Cite</ref> style for consistency. It's jarring to have inline links intermixed with footnote references. Actually, I wish the Mediawiki software somehow handled it automatically, but for now it's a matter of editor attention. LotLE×talk 19:26, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yes sure. If u haven't changed that i will go and do so. --maxrspct ping me 19:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to WikiProject France
[edit]
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
-2007-05-14T01:42:00.000Z-Image:Boleg_oc.gif){kind=link}
STTW (talk) 18:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Japan taskforces
[edit]In order to encourage more participation, and to help people find a specific area in which they are more able to help out, we have organized taskforces at WikiProject Japan. Please visit the Participants page and update the list with the taskforces in which you wish to participate. Links to all the taskforces are found at the top of the list of participants.
Please let me know if you have any questions, and thank you for helping out! ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:45, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Re:Adoption
[edit]Yes, I would love to be adopted!
Dorothy Kernaghan-Baez 18:38, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks thanks thanks!!!!!!
Dorothy Kernaghan-Baez 14:47, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Obstination, sir!
[edit]In the Lenin article you are just behaving obstinately. And unfairly. I can prove what I say in a very simple way. You insist that Richard Pipes cites selectively a Lenin letter to the Politburo. That's false. Richard Pipes transcribes the whole letter! And the whole letter is a totalitarian monstrosity...! JBarreto 22:32, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Social hierarchy (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For future editing tests use the sandbox. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 00:46, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
[edit]The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 04:19, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
September 2007 WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter
[edit]WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter September 2007
--Christopher Tanner, CCC 15:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Requests for comment/Verklempt
[edit]Verklempt is asking that Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Verklempt be deleted. Since you created the page, you may want to participate at Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion#Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment.2FVerklempt. -- Jreferee (Talk) 07:09, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Films roll call
[edit]
An automatic notification by BrownBot 23:59, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]Here's a Barnstar for adopting a user.Swirlex 21:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
|
The Adopting Barnstar | |
| For adopting a user I Swirlex give you this adopting Barnstar. |
WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter
[edit]The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 23:29, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Historical Materialism
[edit]Hi Max, why did you delete my editorial with the comment 'removed confusing editorial' on the Historical Materialism page? I thought that I had explained it as well as possible the presence of Historical Materialism in the broad picture of history with respect to other theories. Please clarify. cjayakumar —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.24.213.109 (talk) 06:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Karl Marx article
[edit]Hallo,
I'm not sure if you still obeserve the Karl Marx article. For your interest, recently User:Madcat87 is challenging and has changed a sentence about M.s prophetisms, which in that form had been inserted by you here.
Greetings, --Schwalker 12:24, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Nice catch!
[edit]On Gansireed, on the Duniverse planets page! --SandChigger 23:01, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello, again. I find it really amusing that you came back a day later and corrected the typo in your msg on my talk page! :D
Did you read about the BBS banning on my page, or know of it from elsewheres? (In other words, do I know you in another place by another name?) --SandChigger 15:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
OK...so you mean you corrected a typo ON their user page?!
Ha ha! Dayum...that's pretty cheeky! ... I LOVE it! (I'm going through your contributions list after I post this.) --SandChigger 11:31, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Found it. "...or is that strine?" Even BETTER than I imagined. Ah...you have made my evening! :D --SandChigger 11:34, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter November 2007
[edit]WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter November 2007
--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 04:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)