User talk:MaxPerry

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Identified. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.Kww (talk) 17:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to In This Life (song). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Lillygirl (talk) 15:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Welcome to the Dollhouse (album). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, your edits will be considered vandalism and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This is the second time I have had to revert the same edit. Here and here. If you can provide sources of this album generally being considered a "failure" by critics, fine. Otherwise, it is simply your opinion, and has no place within a Wikipedia article. —Kww(talk) 16:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Welcome to the Dollhouse (album). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, your edits will be considered vandalism and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Once again, your personal commentaries about albums and songs are completely inappropriate for Wikipedia. You can quote reviews from reliable critics, but you cannot create your own review. You really need to read WP:NPOV and WP:NOR. If you continue down the path you are on, you will wind up blocked.—Kww(talk) 12:06, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Welcome to the Dollhouse (album), you will be blocked from editing. —Kww(talk) 16:45, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, MaxPerry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Referencing

Hi. We welcome you to edit but PLEASE Cite Sources and use Categories!! An external link or reference to a decent site makes a big difference.Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 14:15, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Trading Places (song). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. DiverseMentality^(Boo!) 17:30, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Promise (Girls Aloud song). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. ~~ [ジャム]^[talk] 20:17, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to The Promise (Girls Aloud song), you will be blocked from editing. ~~ [ジャム]^[talk] 20:42, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GET UP VIDEO.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:GET UP VIDEO.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Miles Away (Madonna song) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Techman224^Talk 13:03, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Generation (song)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Generation (song), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generation (song). Thank you.

AfD nomination of I Can Wait Forever

An article that you have been involved in editing, I Can Wait Forever, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Can Wait Forever. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of Cheated on Me

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cheated on Me, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ ^{Drop me a line} 17:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Midnight Bottle.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Midnight Bottle.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil Hot 100 is not an accepted chart

The Brazil Hot 100 is not an accepted chart. Please do not add it or other charts listed in WP:BADCHARTS to articles.—Kww(talk) 17:58, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Coco (album) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Fritzpoll (talk) 18:43, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Midnight Bottle

I didn't delete the page, I redirected it. The text and image can be brought back if the song qualifies for an article. I explained the problem on the edit summary: the song only charted on the Brazil Hot 100. WP:NSONGS requires that a song has charted. Since the Brazil Hot 100 is listed on WP:BADCHARTS, it doesn't count. Since the song didn't chart on any acceptable charts, it doesn't qualify for an article.—Kww(talk) 18:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Midnight Bottle 2.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Midnight Bottle 2.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Monday

Hi
I'm still not finding any reliable sources that can confirm that "Permanent Monday" is going to be the next single by Jordin Sparks, so I removed it from Jordin Sparks (album) again. If you do, could you come to Talk:Jordin Sparks (album) to discuss it?
Cheers, Amalthea^Talk 19:22, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Mercy (OneRepublic song) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Say Headcheese!--hexa Chord ² 19:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. In recent days you have added a large amount of opinionated, unsourced information to Wikipedia. Considering you have already had many warnings and are fully aware of our policies I am issuing you with a final warning. — Realist² 17:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simple Plan

Hey, please don't add what you think it going to be the next single unless you cite to a reliable source. Poe Joe and I watch these articles constantly. It may be cool to see your creation in print (pixels?) but it is only going to last until one of us notices.--Wehwalt (talk) 17:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Jennifer Hudson (album), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DiverseMentality 18:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV edits

Hey, just letting you know that inserting your own commentary on a song's relative success or failure violates Wikipedia's policy on having a neutral point of view. Of course, it would be different if you're stating that someone said that a song was a success or a failure. Please keep that in mind for future edits. Thanks! :) SKS2K6 (talk) 18:38, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:I'm Outta Time (Screenshot).JPEG

Thanks for uploading File:I'm Outta Time (Screenshot).JPEG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:10, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Everything But Mine .gif

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Everything But Mine .gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:56, 16 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:56, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning

You have been warned numerous times about bad sourcing and about introducing your own POV into articles. This edit was so bad that it can only be described as vandalism. You knew that that source wasn't a real source. You knew that source did not support the statement you credited it to. You knew that everything about that edit was invalid. If you keep such edits up, you will be blocked from editing.—Kww(talk) 17:11, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. I've reviewed the history of your talk page, and note that you have not only been warned many times, you have been at next-to-final or final warning stage nearly constantly since you have begun editing.

Image source problem with Image:She's Not Me.JPEG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:She's Not Me.JPEG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:05, 18 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NrDg 21:05, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:More Madonna sings Candy Shop.JPEG

Thanks for uploading File:More Madonna sings Candy Shop.JPEG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Madonna sings Candy Shop.JPEG

Thanks for uploading File:Madonna sings Candy Shop.JPEG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:08, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Candy Shop.JPEG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Candy Shop.JPEG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:44, 19 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NrDg 00:44, 19 December 2008 (UTC) --NrDg 15:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Candy Shop.JPEG)

Thanks for uploading File:Candy Shop.JPEG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Candy Shop.JPEG

Thanks for uploading File:Candy Shop.JPEG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Everything But Mine .gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Everything But Mine .gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Everything But Mine .gif

Thanks for uploading File:Everything But Mine .gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Madonna sings Candy Shop.JPEG

Thanks for uploading File:Madonna sings Candy Shop.JPEG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:51, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Let me be myself.JPEG

Thanks for uploading File:Let me be myself.JPEG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 20:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:ToniPulsealbumcover.jpg)

You've uploaded File:ToniPulsealbumcover.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The End (Simple Plan song)

Hi, I've nominated this article for deletion as unsourced and in my opinion, unlikely. You are free to contribute to the debate.--Wehwalt (talk) 19:42, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pulse (Toni Braxton album)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pulse (Toni Braxton album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable unreleased album with little or no media coverage of substance. Event the title is unconfirmed. Fails WP:NALBUMS and WP:V.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TheJazzDalek (talk) 15:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]