Jump to content

User talk:Mawlid in UAE

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fez (hat), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 13:15, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hi Mawlid in UAE! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Fez (hat) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 13:16, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your warm welcome and advice, I really appreciate it. It's always great to have the guidance of a much experienced person. Mawlid in UAE (talk) 17:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bühler railway station (October 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 14:57, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salma Okonkwo (October 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 10:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mawlid in UAE! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 10:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Nobel X300 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Isuzu.tf. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 11:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mawlid in UAE (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have asked for an unblock today via the talk page and have also sent an e-mail with a request for an unblock. I have been blocked since today. Maybe someone wants to consider my request and give me a reply?

Decline reason:

This doesn't address the concerns that lead to your block. Please read WP:GAB to understand how to write an appropriate unblock request. Yamla (talk) 12:45, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.