User talk:Matthiasdaboss

November 2015

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Vinegar— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 19:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vinegar with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 19:48, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Matthiasdaboss with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 19:53, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Matthiasdaboss. Edison (talk) 19:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. McGeddon (talk) 19:58, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

I can't imagine why anyone would call that an "attack page", but it doesn't matter, because it was obviously vandalism, and you have had more than enough warnings about childish vandalism. You have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:20, 25 November 2015 (UTC)