User talk:Matt McBrien/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Welcome

Hello, Matt McBrien/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Deepu Joseph. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
• Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
• Provide an Edit summary
• Take a look at Consensus of standards. It is always wise to read the talk page of an existing article before making major changes on it. Even then, I typically ask if anyone minds that I make a change. Very often they do! ;-)
• Create a User page

Again, welcome! And if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask - Just click the talk button on my signature.
thunderboltz^{a.k.a.Deepu_Joseph |TALK}

Derek Webb

Hello! Sorry for the delay. Nice work on the Derek Webb article. I really enjoyed reading it. I noticed you've also been working on Webb-related pages. I'm impressed. Keep the good work coming! Together we can make Wikipedia better than the best. Cheers, and happy editing!-- thunderboltz^(Deepu) 09:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Pictures

Hey, as for the Derek Webb top photo, I liked it better because I thought it to be clearer, more recent, and more visually stimulating in its colors. Of course, you may have a differing opinion but that is what I believe. I had also tried putting in the other picture alongside the former picture from Durham, but personally felt it to be too cluttered with one on top of the other. Personally, I like both pictures and left the Durham picture in the Sandra McCracken page (and tried to put my photo alongside it, but again felt it too cluttered). So I tried putting that picture in the top and decided I liked it better for three reasons (I had actually saved the code to the original picture just in case I did not): (1) It is a photo of both Mrs. McCracken and Derek Webb, (2) It is a more recent photo of Mrs. McCracken by at least a year, and (3) Whereas it is not as close-up a photo as the previous, the resolution is higher and I personally think the colors are warmer, causing it to be more appealing to the eye. If you can figure out a way to have all the pictures in that doesn't seem too cluttered or just thrown-together, by all means change it up in whatever order you prefer. I tried and personally couldn't do it. Danielhalton (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 15:43, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey I like - you're better at the coding than I am.Danielhalton (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 03:41, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Mohsen Sazegara

Hi. I think your changes to the article were fine. Barnetj 11:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Surprise!

		The Original Barnstar
		The Original Barnstar is hereby awarded to Pepsi2786 in recognition of his hard work and quality additions to a wide variety of articles. Well deserved!-- thunderboltz(Deepu) 09:10, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Derek Webb

Thanks for your input on the good article candidacy of Derek Webb. I'll see what I can do about more references. Pepsi2786 07:23, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi Pepsi,

Yes, the article looks good, but it is very much underreferenced. Four citations is just not enough for an article of that length. Also, for a Good Article candidate, you really should be using the in-line citations available at WP:CITE. If you need help on learning how to do that, let me know. Happy editing! :) Firsfron of Ronchester 19:40, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi Pepsi,

Sorry it took me a while to get back to you. I've left comments on the DW talk page. Best, Firsfron of Ronchester 17:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for all of your efforts in reviewing the article during it's GA candidacy. I sincerely appreciate the assistance in making it a better article. -- Pepsi2786 01:18, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing all the problems in the article and having a lot of patience. Best of luck, Firsfron of Ronchester 01:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Peer Review of The W's

The W's is going through the Wikipedia:Peer review process. Please leave comments and suggestions at Wikipedia:Peer review/The W's/archive1. Dan, the CowMan 20:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Certainly I will continue improving Justin McRoberts as well as I can. As you probably saw, I created the article. Note, however, that I do not own any of his material beyond a few compilations, thus I am limited in exactly what I can accomplish. I like your edit today and I’ll certainly be doing what I can as the article evolves.

As for your surprise, timing is everything. Dan, the CowMan 21:07, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Across the Sky

Hey Randomn thought here I saw you posted some things on the CCM project page. Well there is a CCM Group article up for deletion. I'm planning on doing some mad editing but could use any input. Also might need some voices on the deletion page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by M-BMor (talk • contribs) 10:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC).

Common Children

Hey Pepsi, I notice that you've done some work on articles that I'm interested in, and I thought I'd ask you to take a look and add your input for some of the following:

• Common Children
• Marc Byrd
• City on a Hill (series)
• Steve Hindalong

Also, I was hoping to find an article on GlassByrd. Do you think it's a notable enough band to warrant an article, or just a mention on the pages of Marc Byrd and Christine Glass? Thanks! HokieRNB 15:04, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3