User talk:MattWorks

Clearing Out Talk Page

I was just clearing out my talk page to leave some space. User talk:MattWorks 15:42, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're nowhere near requiring extra space. Again, deleting the warnings you're getting won't hide them. --Calton | Talk 19:55, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{asbox}} template

The {{asbox}} template is effectively an invitation to other editors to expand an article located in the encylopedia's mainspace and needing expansion. Your userpage is not an article and is not in mainspace, and other editors should not be editing it. Kindly stop adding the {{asbox}} template to your user page. Likewise do not create redirects to point to your userpage, as you did here. General Ization ^Talk 18:50, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Machine_translations regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Calton | Talk 19:55, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MattWorks&diff=782010717&oldid=782010268

Remember that warning? Reread it.

I didn't delete anything, someone from Wikipedia itself did it FOR YOUR OWN PROTECTION.

Also, even without the stuff you put on there being inappropriate, Wikipedia user pages are NOT for self-promotion, which is what I suspect is what led to a previous page deletion.

Bluntly, I don't think you're ready to edit here. --Calton | Talk 14:16, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We gotta find out. User talk:MattWorks 10:17, 2 June 2017 (EDT)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges regarding information which has been removed from Wikipedia's public records.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-llists.wikimedia.org.

Administrators: Information which has been oversighted was considered when this block was placed. Therefore the Arbitration Committee must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing oversight blocks without permission from an oversighter risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

Comments: For your own safety, and despite multiple explanations your edits have had to be suppressed on at least three occasions. For any appeal to be successful you will need to demonstrate an understanding of the reasons we have taken this action. Thryduulf (talk) 14:29, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Doreen Jacobi

Hello, MattWorks,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Doreen Jacobi should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doreen Jacobi .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Mduvekot (talk) 22:40, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Teenager animation" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Teenager animation. Since you had some involvement with the Teenager animation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 01:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]