User talk:MattM4

Welcome.

Shearer

Hello! I don't know if you saw the conversation on the Alan Shearer talk page, but would you be willing to upload those pics for us to use in the article? Thanks - Toon⁰⁵ 21:35, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done and done: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Image:Alanshearerwiki.jpg + see main article. Please edit or tinker if not done properly. MattM4 (talk) 13:58, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, nice to finally have a pic of the Big Man in the article! - Toon⁰⁵ 22:21, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, another request! Thanks for the prior pic, would you be able to upload this pic, as I've cropped it on my comp further, and I think it would add quite well to the article - and I want at least one more pic in the article before I nominate it to WP:FAC (hopefully tonight). Cheers! - Toon⁰⁵ 15:13, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Image:Shearertestlap.jpg / MattM4 (talk) 16:10, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one, I've added a further cropped pic into the article. It is a shame that some people only remember that side of Shearer, and I think some people feel resentful towards successful players of other teams - every player has some blips in their history (Neil Lennon incident), but I think hes record speaks for itself really! Now, fingers crossed for this FA nom! - Toon⁰⁵ 16:33, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newcastle United F.C. season

I've noticed you've been creating quite a few of these stubs lately, all of them without any content except for the infobox and a one line sentence that communicates very little. It'd be more useful if you'd pick a particular season and expand it, rather than create all of these articles that others have to come along and help expand, at best, or maintain. Shadowjams (talk) 08:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Logos on kit images

There was a recent discussion about logos on kit images at WT:FOOTY. I don't know if it's been archived yet, but the discussion resulted in a deletion discussion being started for various kit images. I think the main problem people have with the images is that they are too small to be of any use, and that they are also unnecessary details to be adding to kits that size. – Pee Jay 13:37, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Zlatan Ibrahimović has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. KaySL^talk 16:41, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Matt le Tissier stats

Hi - thanks for the note. The stats came from the book, "In That Number", which lists every game played by Southampton since 1945. It did require me to count up the appearances and goals on a season by season basis. Fortunately the totals came out right so I'm sure they are correct. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 18:12, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the frustration under control

I can sense your growing frustration, but this edit summary is going to lead to trouble. What's the issue, and who is changing them in a way you find inappropriate?—Kww(talk) 13:32, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Kit left arm nufc8788t.png

Thank you for uploading File:Kit left arm nufc8788t.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Kit left arm nufc9899a.png

Thank you for uploading File:Kit left arm nufc9899a.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Newcastle United F.C. 8–0 Sheffield Wednesday F.C.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Newcastle United F.C. 8–0 Sheffield Wednesday F.C., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:41, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kit shorts nufc0607a.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kit shorts nufc0607a.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kit left arm nufc0506t.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kit left arm nufc0506t.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 09:32, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kit shorts nufc0708t.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kit shorts nufc0708t.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:35, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]