User talk:Matheweditking

Stop using my name. Please. - ajay

July 2014

Hello Matheweditking. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Fireblazer350, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Also, try Wikipedia's tutorial for tips on how to edit. Thank you. Bramble claw x 16:17, 24 July 2014 (UTC) Bramble claw x 16:17, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop using my name. Please. - ajay

Reviewer

I have removed your new request for the following reasons:

Your previous request was denied within the last few hours, with a detailed explanation of the reasoning
You once again failed to properly follow the instructions for posting a request, adding a header where it is asked you do not add one
You are making a fool of yourself and it would be better if you focussed on actually improving the encyclopedia. Being obsessed with user rights is the surest way to make sure you don't get them.

I suggest you drop it for now and come back when you have real experience. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:12, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop requesting advanced permissions

I see that you have now requested rollback in five different places in addition to requesting reviewer twice. All you are doing is making an ever-more-compelling case that you should not have any of these user rights. I am going to ask you to stop requesting any advanced permissions of any kind for a period of two months from today. This will give you time to acquire the actual experience necessary to effectively use these permissions, while removing the distraction of constantly worrying about them.

This is a request, but if you do not accept it and continue to agitate for new user rights I may find it necessary to ask the community to formally topic ban you from making such requests. I don't want to do that, really. My time is limited and I'd rather not spend it pushing restrictions on people, but you need to realize that you have to get some real experience, like several hundred edits, with a good portion of reverting vandals and reporting them to WP:AIV before any admin will seriously consider granting any of these permissions. So please, stop asking until you have that experience.

Thanks,

Beeblebrox (talk) 17:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of six months for it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:06, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits have made it abundantly clear to me that you have no interest in actually doing the work of building an encyclopedia and see Wikipedia as more of a toy or a game. It is hoped that in six months you may have gained some perspective and will not treat Wikipedia as a place to goof around and bother people who are engaged in actual useful work. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:08, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 17:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ajayy99, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Arkhaminsanity (talk) 09:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]