User talk:Mateoski06
Welcome!
|
About Your Edit to the Page Irreligion in Pakistan
[edit]Yeah, hi. I reverted your edit adding the link to the page Persecution of atheists in the Middle East. Pakistan is not in the Middle East, its in South Asian. Thanks. --39.57.15.238 (talk) 06:56, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 23
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of anti-cultural, anti-national, and anti-ethnic terms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pagans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
August 2016
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Islamophobia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. This edit was entirely inappropriate. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:49, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- The main issue was the addition of the Judaism template. On its face that makes it look like Judaism is Islamophobic or that it's directly related to it. The article often is vandalized in manners like this. It was unclear to me if this was your intent, so I used the neutral warning template. Not assuming bad faith. If this was done in good faith, please be mindful of how the edit can be perceived, especially in an article that is frequently vandalized by both Islamophobes and Antisemites. Ping me if you need further clarification. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:13, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Template :Discrimination sidebar
[edit]Hello Mateoski06. I'm sorry your edits are being reverted, and I'm glad you at least made an effort to discuss the issue on the talk page first, but as you can see, no one has responded yet to this. So still no clear consensus for your proposed additions. If you aren't getting the response you were hoping for after a while, the next step would be to start a WP:RFC. Sro23 (talk) 19:19, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Mateoski06. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. The discussion at RFD resulted in deletion of "Atheophobic". I wonder whether it should be deleted per WP:CSD#G4. If not, I thought about taking it to RFD again for newer consensus. --George Ho (talk) 02:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Never mind. I made some improvements to the target article. I'll leave the redirect alone for now. --George Ho (talk) 00:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- I apologize. I shouldn't have
underminedunderappreciated your good-faith contributions. I was inconsiderate about your contributions. If it makes you happy, as said above, I'm leaving the redirect page alone for now. Don't leave yet just because of bad experiences you endured. Hey, you can go to WP:Teahouse and ask for help. Better yet, if you want to create an article, I suggest go to Wikipedia:Article wizard. --George Ho (talk) 21:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC); edited. 22:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Almost forgot, you can go to project talk pages of projects specifying on related subjects. By evaluating your contributions, you can search for related Projects at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Culture/Philosophy and religion. I recommend going to a more active project as some projects may be semi-active or inactive at the moment. There are more at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory. George Ho (talk) 22:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hmm... whatever your situation extends to is out of my scope as I know very little about neologism and words. Also, I'm not an expert on subjects that you were interested in. There are links at the #Welcome section. Again, you can go to WP:teahouse (for newcomers and less experienced editors). If you don't feel new, go to WP:help desk. If censorship is your main concern, go to WT:NOT and ask about censorship. You can read Wikipedia:Questions and figure out where to ask question. I hate to see you leave Wikipedia just because of bad experiences you endured. --George Ho (talk) 23:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- BTW, there is "atheophobia", which still exists. And it's widely used word referring to its redirect. I had a talk with someone about that, and I eventually agreed to leave that one alone also. George Ho (talk) 21:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Mateoski06. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Mateoski06. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
"Regressive conservatism" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Regressive conservatism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 14#Regressive conservatism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
"Judaism and terrorism" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect Judaism and terrorism has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 15 § Judaism and terrorism until a consensus is reached. BD2412 T 20:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
"Judaism and terror" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect Judaism and terror has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 15 § Judaism and terror until a consensus is reached. BD2412 T 20:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright claim
[edit]You are giving copyright claim I need to agreement with you 171.49.247.57 (talk) 09:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Regarding what? Mateoski06 (talk) 01:52, 5 July 2024 (UTC)