User talk:Master BateZ

December 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Cartoonito has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cartoonito was changed by Master BateZ (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951927 on 2013-12-13T19:52:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:52, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jns4eva (talk) 19:56, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Cartoonito, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jns4eva (talk) 19:56, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it has become apparent that it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, nor is trolling or other disruptive behavior ever tolerated. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} on your user talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Master BateZ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Unorginal2000 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

It is who I am

Decline reason:

Yes, it looks like you. No, you're not going to be unblocked on this account. Try your original one... Peridon (talk) 21:39, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The name or the vandalism? Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't blocked for the username, on which I offer no opinion. You are blocked because you are obviously here for no constructive purpose. I think Mark made a good call. Dloh cierekim 22:34, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He was declined as being a sock of HoshiNoKaabii2000 (aka Unorginal with many numbers). He's been added to the SPI already as I found when I went to do it. Vandalism, username, sock - a three way block, really... Peridon (talk) 11:42, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Trifecta! Dloh cierekim 13:51, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]