User talk:MassiveNewOrderFan

MassiveNewOrderFan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MassiveNewOrderFan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Derry

Please read WP:DERRY. Thank you 82.28.89.159 (talk) 21:29, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm PatGallacher. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ruth Davidson without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PatGallacher (talk) 14:42, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of British politicians who have crossed the floor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Coburn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nicola Sturgeon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Angus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peers

Hello,

I have noticed that you have recently been removing The Right Honourable from several life peers, for reason of not being in the Most Honourable Privy Council. However, as they are barons/baronesses, they are still entitled to that style, so it should not have been removed.

Good day to you. 81.98.161.139 (talk) 12:02, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm here to say the same thing. I think you've now stopped doing this?

Peers who are not Privy Counsellors = The Rt Hon (or higher title)
Peers who are Privy Counsellors = The Right Hon (or higher title) + PC
Non-peers who are Privy Counsellors = The Right Hon

Hope this helps, Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 22:35, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello, I'm Martinevans123. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kezia Dugdale, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:03, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colin Clark (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian Duncan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Deb (talk) 18:53, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:EPLP, you may be blocked from editing. You were alerted just yesterday that not explaining your edits in an edit summary is disruptive, but apparently that fell on deaf ears. And here you are blanking an entire template without any explanation. Please be advised that any further unexplained edits that are deemed questionable or disruptive may lead to a block. Drmies (talk) 18:44, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And then you did it again. Drmies (talk) 18:45, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northern Ireland Assembly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2007 Scottish Parliament election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colin Fox.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hi MassiveNewOrderFan! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. JaggedHamster (talk) 17:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]