Jump to content

User talk:Masaqui

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Masaqui! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:28, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Protective Action Guide for Nuclear Incidents

[edit]

Hi Masaqui
Please note that I have not corrected, or proof-read, the entire article, only the first two or three paragraphs. I don't know much about Nuclear Incidents - I came to the page because of a mis-spelling of "Recommendation".
Good luck Arjayay (talk) 17:19, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will wait for more corrections to be made. Anyway the page has less errors now. Thanks.--MasAqui (talk) 18:01, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Karuta

[edit]

Regarding my changes to the article Competitive Karuta, <ref> and </ref> tags are to be used to include a complete reference to a website, book, etc. The ref tags are not to be used for examples. The reason you gave was that it may be confusing to some readers, however, placing the example in ref tags will be more confusing, since they will have to look back and forth. If you have any questions, just reply here and place a Talkback template on my page. Thanks for your contributions!

P.S: If I had removed any information from the incorrect ref's and didn't replace it above, I apologize.

gwickwire (talktome) (contribs!) 16:50, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see, you misunderstood footnotes as examples, those were Explanatory notes. I do not know that ref+/ref should be only used for "citation of the source" and not for explanatory note. Let me know if there is a rule. TKS. --MasAqui (talk) 05:52, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, yes, I admit I misunderstood. I agree that the information that was included should be in footnotes. However, there is another way to format a footnote that doesn't cause it to show up in references. For the life of me, I cannot find the policy that we have here on notes vs. references. If you would like, just post the information on the talk page and I'm sure that another editor will come and fix it for you. Sorry about the misunderstanding. gwickwire (talktome) (contribs!) 20:20, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Ocean disposal of radioactive waste, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Izu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tsunami, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iwate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Art Jewelry Forum

[edit]

Hello, I am working on a pet project to help digitize information about the field of metalsmithing+jewelry. I started with making a page for Art jewelry forum (AJF), and have a list of artists that I would like to make pages for as well. The AJF page has been nominated for deletion because it is questioned if the organization is "notable". I am reaching out to you because I saw that you edited some pages that relate to studio craft, and thought you may have an informed opinion (unlike the mathematician who nominated the page for deletion) about whether or not it is a "notable organization". If you have an opinion, one way or another, please way in on the articles for deletion discussion https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Art_jewelry_forumClarefinin (talk) 21:28, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists of earthquakes by year

[edit]

Hi, could you please instead post that material on the talk page? Thanks, Dawnseeker2000 01:38, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. It was moved to the talk page --MasAqui (talk) 02:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Masaqui. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Land cover, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Urban and Barren (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. --MasAqui (talk) 20:01, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Masaqui. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]